From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7CF5537F8; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 20:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727208038; cv=none; b=fAHY8UPLYXiU/j70OPiL4i2PqKonqgl5Tybh+NKEjDpsiutZLOJH42FIb8gDaJhHKOh+Ue5frbZemRt52ZErf5cynTzSZYD6TZa9jXHEg2YwTf9nU7c5fVPE+iZtC+9Xq6kCHPKsM/jSTD+pZs/s0RycjCrLNGTHz9SVb4SqJEo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727208038; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r3jCueu3tNkyyYeljUq/cBhanxoO+tWfQPoQ5TEuNk0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bl4gcfoeTNohuLCby+vG/ZC4r19fLWx8gmZaF01XfVIb7peEccYzVZe9IZe45OWxAUbS8XerOK9VGcByuFvtutwM5YU8ibdHcpbo/gSF9IXX76LMjlcfHsdEk+EoMJ3oyuCnvbECiiMmIfX0IsBT+Ig/ZVJoqoLR20VJeaObo7k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=nyhNgCwR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="nyhNgCwR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=snNgfTx7s33zjptHv6qzP7dNvGpeRub9UFTlzhAZfLY=; b=nyhNgCwRkNYRKIUh48RFKKy5G3 lTbRKYsgdJeBD7UNIc1wkAHEA5cNTt5vN98e+RfVGdT8PdmBkcpdAApmAuJkwYGLsWHslDJqCMBYR P2V8H8B0/05ccqienpR1WTqZxIv9/fa0gNemXQP23131nW4o/14bLkNkdloVl4FrnicrFf1FycZ3G AKBmkARRn6IISPWYPx9z9+J1hD3O5BwbbU7M01P3kK/pYxJ1rfp9VJcRP/62ifnfitMP+4rbFXa89 f/apHV9eJo1ke7psHXsYewYcQPyXyd8GlFmvIVNPAULb5kXGauyY0zzqBo7PbO1hSFokIoxIlzna8 V32FSZ+g==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1stBhz-00000002LGX-0Pr9; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 20:00:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:00:26 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Christian Brauner , Pankaj Raghav Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] add block size > page size support to ramfs Message-ID: References: <20240924192351.74728-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240924192351.74728-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > Add block size > page size to ramfs as we support minimum folio order > allocation in the page cache. The changes are very minimal, and this is > also a nice way to stress test just the page cache changes for minimum > folio order. I don't really see the point of upstreaming this. I'm sure it was useful for your testing. And splitting the patch in two makes no sense to me; the combined patch is not large. > Pankaj Raghav (2): > ramfs: add blocksize mount option > ramfs: enable block size > page size > > fs/ramfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)