mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: vlan: Use vlan_prio instead of vlan_qos in mapping
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:29:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxT3oVQ27erIoTVz@shredder.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241018141233.2568-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:12:33PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> The vlan_qos member is used to save the vlan qos, but we only save the
> priority. Also, we will get the priority in vlan netlink and proc.
> We can just save the vlan priority using vlan_prio, so we can use vlan_prio
> to get the priority directly.
> 
> For flexibility, we introduced vlan_dev_get_egress_priority() helper
> function. After this patch, we will call vlan_dev_get_egress_priority()
> instead of vlan_dev_get_egress_qos_mask() in irdma.ko and rdma_cm.ko.
> Because we don't need the shift and mask operations anymore.
> 
> There is no functional changes.

Not sure I understand the motivation.

IIUC, currently, struct vlan_priority_tci_mapping::vlan_qos is shifted
and masked in the control path (vlan_dev_set_egress_priority) so that
these calculations would not need to be performed in the data path where
the VLAN header is constructed (vlan_dev_hard_header /
vlan_dev_hard_start_xmit).

This patch seems to move these calculations to the data path so that
they would not need to be performed in the control path when dumping the
priority mapping via netlink / proc.

Why is it a good trade-off?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-20 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 14:12 Yajun Deng
2024-10-19  8:30 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-20 12:29 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-10-21  2:23   ` Yajun Deng
2024-10-21 16:27   ` Guillaume Nault
2024-10-22  1:48     ` Yajun Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZxT3oVQ27erIoTVz@shredder.mtl.com \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®