From: Mohamed Ghanmi <mohamed.ghanmi@supcom.tn>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: corentin.chary@gmail.com, luke@ljones.dev,
srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, Michael@phoronix.com,
casey.g.bowman@intel.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Fix inconsistent use of thermal policies
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:45:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxzIMsffFj2lvScb@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025191514.15032-3-W_Armin@gmx.de>
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:15:14PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
> When changing the thermal policy using the platform profile API,
> a Vivobook thermal policy is stored in throttle_thermal_policy_mode.
>
> However everywhere else a normal thermal policy is stored inside this
> variable, potentially confusing the platform profile.
>
> Fix this by always storing normal thermal policy values inside
> throttle_thermal_policy_mode and only do the conversion when writing
> the thermal policy to hardware.
>
> Fixes: bcbfcebda2cb ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: add support for vivobook fan profiles")
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 64 +++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
the original patch that i submitted did actually have the remapping
of the different fan profiles in the throttle_thermal_policy_write() methods
because it was the cleaner solution [1]. however after having a discussion with luke,
he shared that he might be planning to remove the throttle_thermal_policy sysfs interface
in favour of platform_profiles [2] because of a refactoring he had been working on.
currently to control fan profiles through this driver you could use
either /sys/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/throttle_thermal_policy
(redundant and might get removed in the future) or through platform profiles which is the
better way of doing things.
for the reasons mentionned above, I decided to keep
throttle_therma_policy_write() unchanged and to move the remapping logic
to the asus_wmi_platform_profile_set(). this adopts the approach of
having a logical mapping stored in asus_wmi struct that has to be
converted to a physical mapping whenever needed [3].
so, if luke thinks that this won't cause any merge conflicts with his
work [4] then i see no problem with this approach even though it might cause an
order change when calling throttle_thermal_policy_switch_next()
Best Regards,
Mohamed G.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240421194320.48258-2-mohamed.ghanmi@supcom.tn/ # [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/4de768c5-aae5-4fda-a139-a8b73c8495a1@app.fastmail.com/ # [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/ZnlEuiP4Dgqpf51C@laptop/ # [3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20240930000046.51388-1-luke@ljones.dev/ # [4]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-26 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 19:15 [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Fix thermal profile handling Armin Wolf
2024-10-25 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Fix thermal profile initialization Armin Wolf
2024-10-26 4:23 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-10-25 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Fix inconsistent use of thermal policies Armin Wolf
2024-10-26 9:56 ` Hans de Goede
2024-10-26 11:49 ` Armin Wolf
2024-10-26 10:45 ` Mohamed Ghanmi [this message]
2024-10-26 10:59 ` Hans de Goede
2024-10-26 11:55 ` Armin Wolf
2024-10-26 11:53 ` Armin Wolf
2024-10-26 4:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Fix thermal profile handling srinivas pandruvada
2024-10-29 1:19 ` Bowman, Casey G
2024-10-26 9:53 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxzIMsffFj2lvScb@laptop \
--to=mohamed.ghanmi@supcom.tn \
--cc=Michael@phoronix.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=casey.g.bowman@intel.com \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@ljones.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®