mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] -next lockdep invalid wait context
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:08:05 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZykNhbMOrlgCXFYJ@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyV2DfuIPsISds-1@Boquns-Mac-mini.local>

Hello,

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 05:45:01PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
...
> Because it's a different bug.
> 
> 	schedule():
> 	  __schedule():
> 	    rq_lock(); // <- rq lock is a raw spin lock, so no sleep inside
> 	    switch_mm_irqs_off():
> 	      trace_tlb_flush():
> 	        bpf_trace_run2():
> 		  stack_map_get_build_id_offset():
> 		    mmap_read_trylock(): // this is actually ok, because
> 		    			 // trylock() on rwsem won't
> 					 // sleep.
> 		      __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned():
> 		        get_mm_memcg_path():
> 			  cgroup_path():
> 			    kernfs_path_from_node():
> 			      read_lock_irqsave(); // on RT, read_lock()
> 			      			   // is a rwsem IIUC,
> 						   // so might sleep.
> 						   // hence the issue.
> 
> Maybe kernfs can use RCU instead of read_lock here? I don't know...

Yeah, we should be able to make kn->name RCU protected and drop the usage of
the rename lock in read paths.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-30 21:05 Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-30 21:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-30 22:34   ` Marco Elver
2024-10-30 23:04     ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-30 23:10     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31  7:21       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-10-31  7:35         ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-31  7:55           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-10-31  8:18             ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-01 17:14               ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31 17:50             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-01 19:50               ` Boqun Feng
2024-11-01 19:54                 ` [PATCH] scftorture: Use workqueue to free scf_check Boqun Feng
2024-11-01 23:35                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-03  3:35                     ` Boqun Feng
2024-11-03 15:03                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-04 10:50                         ` [PATCH 1/2] scftorture: Move memory allocation outside of preempt_disable region Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-04 10:50                           ` [PATCH 2/2] scftorture: Use a lock-less list to free memory Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-05  1:00                             ` Boqun Feng
2024-11-07 11:21                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-07 14:08                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-07 14:43                                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-07 14:59                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-11-02  0:12         ` [BUG] -next lockdep invalid wait context Hillf Danton
2024-11-02  0:45           ` Boqun Feng
2024-11-04 18:08             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-11-05  9:37               ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-08 10:05               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-08 17:02                 ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-08 17:12                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-08 22:24                   ` [PATCH] kernfs: Use RCU for kernfs_node::name lookup Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-08 22:31                     ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-11 17:04                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-12 19:02                         ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-13  7:58                           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-11-08 23:16                     ` Hillf Danton
2024-11-08 23:48                       ` [syzbot] [kernfs?] WARNING: locking bug in kernfs_path_from_node syzbot
2024-11-11  4:49                     ` [PATCH] kernfs: Use RCU for kernfs_node::name lookup kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZykNhbMOrlgCXFYJ@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®