From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBFFA1FAC53; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731522591; cv=none; b=aOXNbOzS2vjuM+vTx5xyDBIrzKXOMOF8INyoFgFDuYZ7A2RZ/DB58H8wnhga869/NhwDpcAPcZvZYOFI4OGtOA9lP7Sc7+4vXdKXtv67vrBhTtHKYXmEtwn3nNuCI00dN25/Ogx+N7bbGCoReNuYh8/MN/C2T6ZlEQKvHFkrjnE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731522591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PVDbYbNqRERQaA9TjMSh0em+KssXtcnQxggmRi2efsA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nWr35q1lW7R26hWVNYMTIM//slGwlPNh4py4OZomJ9q4UF6+g5ULQ1q1XMeUn8zJHeUYapwYW4BuvJFSWtw9oJqtj5gvX6N4nuSl5yPIyxZtkVTP4GAmlG2n/31JRpO4EFLCckFGViSzmKJDAspCqI+twnYOzxXrW8UjjdeyIzY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SF91YXhY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SF91YXhY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D7AAC4CEC3; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:29:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1731522591; bh=PVDbYbNqRERQaA9TjMSh0em+KssXtcnQxggmRi2efsA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SF91YXhY1ySElLg5xEuFdftyqMktNaZoSUkruyuHZoowwUycaGNLPUqGWb09MNvrR mnZGqEYkGbbTvW5+eoUub02HkOItVXZrB7yk7vCmLpH2VbNoqxmkW0JfncyFqoKhOt 7j22irKZUJktZwKD4+E4jbBXrOJGI6XEi0OASSdNXiK1z1B6q/fJsUcfRZBQZDS+1j LQGtr8NTpkv4vdBJj8pY/bUWrlWE3K0WJxcqfbzdxqmySHRuqfIp00NxXjDbtURheQ 9ovB/IYK3C8btkjtlNL4E5pYKroQZapAQTpn9vHO6bO5ClaT8LecQlNyQYn1HyNmUf lkugInU8/bm6g== Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:29:50 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Maxime Ripard , Johannes Weiner , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Zefan Li , Andrew Morton , Friedrich Vock , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] kernel/cgroups: Add "dev" memory accounting cgroup. Message-ID: References: <20241023075302.27194-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> <20241024-beautiful-spaniel-of-youth-f75b61@houat> <20241028-meaty-mega-nuthatch-3d74b1@houat> <20241029203834.GA636494@cmpxchg.org> <20241106-vivacious-eagle-of-gaiety-44a419@houat> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 03:58:25PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: ... > Thanks for all feedback and discussion. I checked mostly on patchwork so I > missed the discussion here. Fortunately it's only been about naming. :) > > I'm thinking of adding a 'high' knob as well, that will work similarly to > high in normal mem controller. (so not proportionally calculated like 'max', > but (usage + allocated) < max = ok. > > Recursively of course. I'd be cautious about adding knobs. These being published API, it's easy to paint oneself into a corner. I suggest starting with what's essential. Thanks. -- tejun