From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
tianyou.li@intel.com, pan.deng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Reduce expensive locks for unbound workqueue
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 06:44:28 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zzd6bLND-dwE-xZb@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115054936.113567-1-wangyang.guo@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 01:49:36PM +0800, Wangyang Guo wrote:
> For unbound workqueue, pwqs usually map to just a few pools. Most of
> the time, pwqs will be linked sequentially to wq->pwqs list by cpu
> index. Usually, consecutive CPUs have the same workqueue attribute
> (e.g. belong to the same NUMA node). This makes pwqs with the same
> pool cluster together in the pwq list.
>
> Only do lock/unlock if the pool has changed in flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs().
> This reduces the number of expensive lock operations.
>
> The performance data shows this change boosts FIO by 65x in some cases
> when multiple concurrent threads write to xfs mount points with fsync.
>
> FIO Benchmark Details
> - FIO version: v3.35
> - FIO Options: ioengine=libaio,iodepth=64,norandommap=1,rw=write,
> size=128M,bs=4k,fsync=1
> - FIO Job Configs: 64 jobs in total writing to 4 mount points (ramdisks
> formatted as xfs file system).
> - Kernel Codebase: v6.12-rc5
> - Test Platform: Xeon 8380 (2 sockets)
>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
Applied to wq/for-6.13.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-15 5:49 Wangyang Guo
2024-11-15 6:38 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-11-15 16:44 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zzd6bLND-dwE-xZb@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®