From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, james.clark@linaro.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/test: fix perf ftrace test on s390
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:54:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zzvh1XZzxXrUdhG-@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115065735.2753032-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 07:57:35AM +0100, Thomas Richter wrote:
> On s390 the perf test case ftrace sometimes fails as follows:
>
> # ./perf test ftrace
> 79: perf ftrace tests : FAILED!
> #
>
> The failure depends on the kernel .config file. Some configurarions
> always work fine, some do not. The ftrace profile test mostly fails,
> because the ring buffer was not large enough, and some lines
> (especially the interesting ones with nanosleep in it) where dropped.
>
> To achieve success for all our tested kernel configurations, enlarge
> the buffer to store the traces complete without wrapping.
> The default buffer size is too small for all kernel configurations.
> Set the buffer size of /sys/kernel/tracing/buffer_size_kb to 16 MB
>
> Output after:
> # ./perf test ftrace
> 79: perf ftrace tests : Ok
> #
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/ftrace.sh | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/ftrace.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/ftrace.sh
> index a6ee740f0d7e..6161a8bdc251 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/ftrace.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/ftrace.sh
> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ output=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.ftrace.XXXXXX)
>
> cleanup() {
> rm -f "${output}"
> + if [ "$(uname -m)" = "s390x" ]
> + then
> + echo $ftrace_size > /sys/kernel/tracing/buffer_size_kb
> + fi
> +
>
> trap - EXIT TERM INT
> }
> @@ -80,6 +85,12 @@ test_ftrace_profile() {
> echo "perf ftrace profile test [Success]"
> }
Could you please use `perf ftrace profile -m 16M ...` instead?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> +if [ "$(uname -m)" = "s390x" ]
> +then
> + ftrace_size=$(cat /sys/kernel/tracing/buffer_size_kb)
> + echo 16384 > /sys/kernel/tracing/buffer_size_kb
> +fi
> +
> test_ftrace_list
> test_ftrace_trace
> test_ftrace_latency
> --
> 2.47.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-15 6:57 Thomas Richter
2024-11-19 0:54 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zzvh1XZzxXrUdhG-@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®