From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
"Serge E . Hally" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] Smack: fix a dereference before null check on sock->sk
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:44:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a01d151d-50ed-c778-d30f-2b9e1c8defb6@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209171127.5029-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 2/9/2017 9:11 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The initialisation of pointer ssp is from a dereference on sock->sk
> before sock-sk is null checked, hence there is a potential for a
> null pointer deference. Fix this by moving the assignment of ssp
> to just before it is used in the call to smk_ipv6_check.
>
> Also minor clean up of code to reduce #ifdef noise.
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#1324196 ("Dereference before null check")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index fc8fb31..0c5656d 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -2897,10 +2897,6 @@ static int smack_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *sap,
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> struct sockaddr_in6 *sip = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap;
> #endif
> -#ifdef SMACK_IPV6_SECMARK_LABELING
> - struct smack_known *rsp;
> - struct socket_smack *ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
> -#endif
>
> if (sock->sk == NULL)
> return 0;
> @@ -2915,10 +2911,17 @@ static int smack_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *sap,
> if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6))
> return -EINVAL;
> #ifdef SMACK_IPV6_SECMARK_LABELING
> - rsp = smack_ipv6host_label(sip);
> - if (rsp != NULL)
> - rc = smk_ipv6_check(ssp->smk_out, rsp, sip,
> - SMK_CONNECTING);
> + {
> + struct smack_known *rsp = smack_ipv6host_label(sip);
I make a habit of not using nested declarations.
I appreciate the intent of the patch, but I would
rather take a more global approach to the cleanup.
> +
> + if (rsp != NULL) {
> + struct socket_smack *ssp =
> + sock->sk->sk_security;
> +
> + rc = smk_ipv6_check(ssp->smk_out, rsp, sip,
> + SMK_CONNECTING);
> + }
> + }
> #endif
> #ifdef SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING
> rc = smk_ipv6_port_check(sock->sk, sip, SMK_CONNECTING);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-09 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-09 17:11 Colin King
2017-02-09 18:44 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2017-02-09 18:45 ` Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a01d151d-50ed-c778-d30f-2b9e1c8defb6@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®