From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466A82D7B8; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719486988; cv=none; b=WlxTiv75JrzaER87SrgKYFjVI8u8Dv+q5O8WGWXZ2pfSUUB8DsfUEOdXk7NAJIsXZFtqeVgADTC0l4ToXLEoLBicVfaF9wx2Pevz77Cn1VBMueHtyx+lsQWeo/FAXybiJxqdEqm+mA0mMPxarlVFYrZ5xGKychSD5E2Kf2gH42o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719486988; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pMHGxf/PL51qw2MfQE3siIsDZW3Ft6ZMS5bJo/0MHmw=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Ia6O2SybR7tByOMXKrcq4sIup/rhm0fN6FoaPjsBF2rCGtKm6RSTHZK2wfMVUPhMfFUspKYCr4oKNmD7cGHTSBjsbDzGVhLm3Na74Psls2LtxgvQPSvlVM8KwVpH+HPdB0i+BQWy+IAHBN2M46hjqxzKW3L7fU3epx79VkHPC1s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W8wrF4rhxzZgZ7; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:11:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.61]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F53218006E; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:16:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.69.30.204] (10.69.30.204) by dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:16:23 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/13] First try to replace page_frag with page_frag_cache To: Andrew Lunn CC: , , , , , Alexander Duyck , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , , , References: <20240625135216.47007-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:16:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemf200006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.61) On 2024/6/27 1:12, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Silly nitpick, but maybe for the next version you change the Subject: > to Tenth try to replace page_frag with page_frag.... :-) Yes, it is somewhat confusing for the 'First try' part. I guess I can change it to highlight the effort and commitment behind the trying:-) > > Andrew > . >