From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752649AbeDQIcq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 04:32:46 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:26511 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbeDQIco (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 04:32:44 -0400 From: Olivier MOYSAN To: "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "perex@perex.cz" , "tiwai@suse.com" , "mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com" , Alexandre TORGUE , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "robh@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kernel@stlinux.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" CC: Arnaud POULIQUEN , Benjamin GAIGNARD , "rmk@arm.linux.org.uk" , "jsarha@ti.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: stm32: sai: add support of iec958 controls Thread-Index: AQHTuugk+f/v2G3G5kiIINnSVNO0DaQEtPsA Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:29:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1520958428-10930-1-git-send-email-olivier.moysan@st.com> In-Reply-To: <1520958428-10930-1-git-send-email-olivier.moysan@st.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.75.127.116] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <2457FA169E377F43A07A71F8D69433AF@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-17_03:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id w3H8Wu8q029305 Hello, I guess the blocking patch in this patchset is the patch "add IEC958 channel status control helper". This patch has been reviewed several times, but did not get a ack so far. If you think these helpers will not be merged, I will reintegrate the corresponding code in stm driver. Please let me know, if I need to prepare a v2 without helpers, or if we can go further in the review of iec helpers patch ? Best regards olivier On 03/13/2018 05:27 PM, Olivier Moysan wrote: > This patchset adds support of iec958 controls to STM32 SAI driver. > > The patch makes use of iec958 control status helpers previously proposed > and discussed through the following threads: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8062601/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8091551/ (v2) > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462961/ (v3) > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8533731/ (v4) > > Olivier Moysan (3): > ALSA: pcm: add IEC958 channel status control helper > ASoC: stm32: sai: add iec958 controls support > ASoC: dmaengine_pcm: document process callback > > include/sound/dmaengine_pcm.h | 2 + > include/sound/pcm_iec958.h | 19 +++++++ > sound/core/pcm_iec958.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > sound/soc/stm/Kconfig | 1 + > sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 5 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >