From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Relax required supplies
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 09:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a093e1ba-95cf-4767-82dc-c84db08a1edb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921232603.3129898-1-robh@kernel.org>
On 22/09/2026 01:26, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> For the QUSB2 PHY binding, keep the three regulator supplies required
> except for legacy IPQ6018 nodes that do not describe the board rails.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
I think this is fine. These devices do not expose controllable supplies,
so the supplies are there, but all other IPQxxxx variants just use
regulator-fixed stubs.
We can fix it by relaxing constraints or adding semi-fake regulator stubs.
With checkpatch warning fixed:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 23:26 Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-12 16:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-10-17 7:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a093e1ba-95cf-4767-82dc-c84db08a1edb@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®