From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
vivien.didelot@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] Documentation: net: dsa: sja1105: Add info about supported traffic modes
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 19:17:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0b29ac4-7159-6ccf-9ad1-8193951be7ea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190504011826.30477-10-olteanv@gmail.com>
On 5/3/2019 6:18 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst b/Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst
> index 7c13b40915c0..a70a04164d07 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst
> @@ -63,6 +63,38 @@ If that changed setting can be transmitted to the switch through the dynamic
> reconfiguration interface, it is; otherwise the switch is reset and
> reprogrammed with the updated static configuration.
>
> +Traffic support
> +===============
> +
> +The switches do not support switch tagging in hardware. But they do support
> +customizing the TPID by which VLAN traffic is identified as such. The switch
> +driver is leveraging ``CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q`` by requesting that special
> +VLANs (with a custom TPID of ``ETH_P_EDSA`` instead of ``ETH_P_8021Q``) are
> +installed on its ports when not in ``vlan_filtering`` mode. This does not
> +interfere with the reception and transmission of real 802.1Q-tagged traffic,
> +because the switch does no longer parse those packets as VLAN after the TPID
> +change.
> +The TPID is restored when ``vlan_filtering`` is requested by the user through
> +the bridge layer, and general IP termination becomes no longer possible through
> +the switch netdevices in this mode.
> +
> +The switches have two programmable filters for link-local destination MACs.
> +These are used to trap BPDUs and PTP traffic to the master netdevice, and are
> +further used to support STP and 1588 ordinary clock/boundary clock
> +functionality.
> +
> +The following traffic modes are supported over the switch netdevices:
> +
> ++--------------------+------------+------------------+------------------+
> +| | Standalone | Bridged with | Bridged with |
> +| | ports | vlan_filtering 0 | vlan_filtering 1 |
> ++====================+============+==================+==================+
> +| Regular traffic | Yes | Yes | No (use master) |
> ++--------------------+------------+------------------+------------------+
Just to make sure I fully understand the limitation here and sorry for
making you repeat it since I am sure you have explained it already.
Let's say that I have a bridge with vlan_filtering=1 configured, and I
assign an IP address to the bridge master device (as is a common thing
with e.g.: SOHO routers), does that mean I cannot ping any stations
behind that bridge at all?
We used to have this problem with DSA master devices being a bridge
member which was fixed a while ago by simply denying them a bridge join
[1], would that be something to rework somehow here such that we can let
your DSA master device join the bridge to continue delivering frames to
the bridge master?
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8db0a2ee2c6302a1dcbcdb93cb731dfc6c0cdb5e
> +| Management traffic | Yes | Yes | Yes |
> +| (BPDU, PTP) | | | |
> ++--------------------+------------+------------------+------------------+
> +
> Switching features
> ==================
>
> @@ -92,6 +124,23 @@ that VLAN awareness is global at the switch level is that once a bridge with
> ``vlan_filtering`` enslaves at least one switch port, the other un-bridged
> ports are no longer available for standalone traffic termination.
>
> +Topology and loop detection through STP is supported.
> +
> +L2 FDB manipulation (add/delete/dump) is currently possible for the first
> +generation devices. Aging time of FDB entries, as well as enabling fully static
> +management (no address learning and no flooding of unknown traffic) is not yet
> +configurable in the driver.
> +
> +Other notable features
> +======================
> +
> +The switches have a PTP Hardware Clock that can be steered through SPI and used
> +for timestamping management traffic on ingress and egress.
> +Also, the T, Q and S devices support TTEthernet (an implementation of SAE
> +AS6802 from TTTech), which is a set of Ethernet QoS enhancements somewhat
> +similar in behavior to IEEE TSN (time-aware shaping, time-based policing).
> +Configuring these features is currently not supported in the driver.
> +
> Device Tree bindings and board design
> =====================================
>
>
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-04 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-04 1:18 [PATCH net-next 0/9] Traffic support for SJA1105 DSA driver Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] net: dsa: Call driver's setup callback after setting up its switchdev notifier Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] net: dsa: Allow drivers to filter packets they can decode source port from Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:00 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: Keep private info in the skb->cb Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-04 2:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: Add support for deferred xmit Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-04 2:10 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: dsa: Add a private structure pointer to dsa_port Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for traffic through standalone ports Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for Spanning Tree Protocol Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-05-04 1:18 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] Documentation: net: dsa: sja1105: Add info about supported traffic modes Vladimir Oltean
2019-05-04 2:17 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2019-05-04 2:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0b29ac4-7159-6ccf-9ad1-8193951be7ea@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome