From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net (013.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1223B0AD1; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783947323; cv=none; b=Isfbrxi70/kOOPaoE8BTlOr13oWkeBU6vSx2Ap69wF+OQDdU+IYFjOTPVzJV9FLD4RkU3pmyMH2H9fWSE3Na4asHhB5YuHm2n/0lWpWSA/RWFUX9Zm6HPTWexkEOg/wqrpXdNxLc+Iv3NSH17gZ6xdqNMPbBYEnhrJw6LJau0c0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783947323; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cYr1+KwtV4KNwQRSLNKJMkkhT4wWNQ8pYJ9i6VxfJe4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=c6SfDvg9/LLxEPhrbGwWrRkfFHcyKyuBVBtWzHXB1+DIZ1M819vjW7G+eq2OH0T2/ImL6kDiPTxtGrwoIwvzh1Xrw+XDz03B6TuwhS63goGi7sTdWo4/UYxDIMljSAT/dB6fNv4v5DXWoDYIvLlBsX8CQioLEoRC8lWv3bWXtKA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=tG6QDpcl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="tG6QDpcl" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gzMq71qr2zlfpM9; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1783947309; x=1786539310; bh=cYr1+KwtV4KNwQRSLNKJMkkh T4wWNQ8pYJ9i6VxfJe4=; b=tG6QDpclc3jtoZyK/dILhZSrzED1bWpWYfbRrWV+ SHPJUg4uH6IsiLreSCdMQnQqpsH6QCCksAH6UbvQACjrZZKGJbzWIENuCTsq0Pc9 HVOxy3Gj1YRkePYcONgh9f7tSikksrveWfyhFmGlvZ9MRJjzjl7ILbe7sKUOiYup KH5IvjpPLYqZlpGdrr8aHje3QpQsDPPpjWmK26qbGjp42o6v1lAXCAS3yVs9hd3v nAj19JXgynCKFU/dCRztLf7Ayl/7F/zlrHtyPQoFg5EO2TNzoNmHsMx9JSKKU0G5 lTKHExn9mlujYlDa2QyON8SjoZ7ZzgYI1otHWG9E9dQhEg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (013.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id yNl0xkdai_q6; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.51.14] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gzMpw0yXCzlfl7l; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 05:55:02 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add support for the aggregated read query opcode To: hyenc.jeong@samsung.com, "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Cc: ALIM AKHTAR , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jinyoung Choi , Dukhyun Kwon , Jeuk Kim , Keoseong Park , Jaemyung Lee , Jieon Seol , Gyusun Lee , Yunjae Jo References: <6d087f28-5795-4929-b5d3-3f78d9b9bc60@acm.org> <20260710054556epcms2p68986e2af26f42e63c87ab8fde034e450@epcms2p6> <20260713025227epcms2p41de509bb713eb7a6be2c945073be6b3a@epcms2p4> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20260713025227epcms2p41de509bb713eb7a6be2c945073be6b3a@epcms2p4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/12/26 7:52 PM, Hyeoncheol Jeong wrote: > Would it be okay to keep utp_transfer_cmd_desc as is and give > just the reserved tag a dedicated 4 KiB response descriptor? > Regular tags and normal I/O would stay unchanged. That sounds better to me but how to implement the above proposal without slowing down the hot path? Thanks, Bart.