From: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@gmail.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mchauras@linux.ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/entry: Fix double accounting of user time on interrupt entry
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:15:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0d95277e5771dc74afdc8058448b4e89c3a2cd7.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ape0GY5__P-_DdxF@li-1a3e774c-28e4-11b2-a85c-acc9f2883e29.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2026-09-02 at 11:01 +0530, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya wrote:
Hi Mukesh,
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 10:36:28AM +0530, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:
> > Since the switch to generic entry, an interrupt taken from user mode
> > accounts user time twice: once in arch_interrupt_enter_prepare() and
> > again in arch_enter_from_user_mode(), which irqentry_enter() invokes
> > for the same interrupt:
> >
> > arch_interrupt_enter_prepare()
> > account_cpu_user_entry()
> > irqentry_enter()
> > arch_enter_from_user_mode()
> > account_cpu_user_entry()
> >
> > account_cpu_user_entry() accumulates the time spent in user mode
> > since the last return to user space, so the second call charges the
> > same interval again.
> >
> > With CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=y this roughly doubles the
> > reported user time of any workload that takes interrupts. On a
> > pseries LPAR, ps/top show ~200% CPU for a single-threaded CPU-bound
> > loop, and time(1) reports user time about twice the elapsed time.
> >
> > Remove the accounting from arch_interrupt_enter_prepare() and rely on
> > arch_enter_from_user_mode(), which runs for both syscalls and
> > interrupts. The duplicate account_stolen_time() call is removed the
> > same way.
> >
> > Fixes: bee25f97ad24 ("powerpc: Enable GENERIC_ENTRY feature")
> > Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Verified on a pseries LPAR (CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=y),
> > 7.3.0-rc1, single-threaded CPU-bound loop:
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > $ python3 -c 'while True: pass' &
> > $ sleep 3; ps -p $! -o pid,etime,time,pcpu
> > PID ELAPSED TIME %CPU
> > 4980 00:03 00:00:06 210
> >
> > After:
> >
> > $ python3 -c 'while True: pass' &
> > $ sleep 3; ps -p $! -o pid,etime,time,pcpu
> > PID ELAPSED TIME %CPU
> > 4951 00:03 00:00:03 105
> >
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/entry-common.h | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > index c5adb5006361..984294e62568 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > @@ -222,8 +222,6 @@ static inline void arch_interrupt_enter_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >
> > if (user_mode(regs)) {
> > kuap_lock();
> > - account_cpu_user_entry();
> > - account_stolen_time();
> Yeah, that's dual accounting the time.
>
> Thanks for the fix.
> > } else {
> > kuap_save_and_lock(regs);
> > /*
> > @@ -426,6 +424,10 @@ static __always_inline void arch_enter_from_user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > #endif
> > kuap_assert_locked();
> > booke_restore_dbcr0();
> > + /*
> > + * User and stolen time is accounted here for every entry from
> > + * user mode. The interrupt prepare hooks must not account again.
> > + */
> I think this comment is very specific to the current problem. We already
> have a commit history to explain this, I guess we can remove this
> comment.
Agreed, I will drop it in v2.
>
> With that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@gmail.com>
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Mukesh
> > account_cpu_user_entry();
> > account_stolen_time();
> >
> >
> > base-commit: fb442a6673ff1046bf67754957d95880fdb394b5
> > --
> > 2.54.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 5:06 Aboorva Devarajan
2026-09-02 5:31 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-09-02 17:45 ` Aboorva Devarajan [this message]
2026-09-02 5:36 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-02 19:44 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2026-09-03 4:51 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-02 7:07 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-02 20:14 ` Aboorva Devarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0d95277e5771dc74afdc8058448b4e89c3a2cd7.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®