mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@emagii.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Copying Device Tree File into reserved area of VMLINUX before deployment
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:23:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0f9d598-04af-fddd-58ad-09db10ec19da@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b31e22b-202f-6fca-28f2-e16e6af6c6b7@emagii.com>

adding devicetree list, devicetree maintainers

On 11/18/17 12:59, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> I noticed when checking out the OpenWRT support for the board that they have a method to avoid having to pass the device tree address to the kernel, and can thus boot device tree based kernels with U-boots that
> does not support device trees.
> 
> Is this something that would be considered useful for including in mainstream:
> 
> BACKGROUND:
> Trying to load a yocto kernel into a MIPS target (MT7620A based),
> and the U-Boot is more than stupid.
> Does not support the "run" command as an example.
> They modified the U-Boot MAGIC Word to complicate things.
> The U-Boot is not configured to use device tree files.
> The board runs a 2.6 kernel right now.
> 
> Several attempts by me a and others to rebuild U-Boot according to the H/W vendors source code and build instructions results in a bricked unit. Bricked units cannot be recovered.
> 
> Not my choice of H/W, so I cannot change it.
> 
> 
> ===================================================================
> OPENWRT:
> I noticed when checking out the OpenWRT support for the board that they have a method to avoid having to pass the device tree address to the kernel, and can thus boot device tree based kernels with U-boots that
> does not support device trees.
> 
> What they do is to reserve 16 kB of kernel space, and tag it with an ASCII string "OWRTDTB:".
> After the kernel and dtb is built, a utility "patch-dtb" will update the vmlinux binary, copying in the device tree file.
> 
> ===================================================================
> It would be useful to me, and I could of course patch the mainstream kernel, but first I would like to check if this is of interest for mainstream.
> 
> I envisage the support would look something like:
> 
> ============
> Kconfig.
> config MIPS
>     select    HAVE_IMAGE_DTB
> 
> config    HAVE_IMAGE_DTB
>     bool
> 
> if HAVE_IMAGE_DTB
> config     IMAGE_DTB
>     bool    "Allocated space for DTB within image
> 
> config    DTB_SIZE
>     int    "DTB space (kB)
> 
> config    DTB_TAG
>     string    "DTB space tag"
>     default    "OWRTDTB:"
> endif
> 
> ============
> Some Makefile
> obj-$(CONFIG_INCLUDE_DTB) += image_dtb.o
> 
> ============
> image_dtb.S:
>     .text
>     .align    5
>     .ascii    CONFIG_DTB_TAG
>     EXPORT(__image_dtb)
>     .fill    DTB_SIZE * 1024
> 
> ===================
> arch/mips/xxx/of.c:
> 
> #if    defined(CONFIG_IMAGE_DTB)
>     if (<conditions to boot from dtb_space>)
>         __dt_setup_arch(__dtb_start);
>     else
>         __dt_setup_arch(&__image_dtb);
> #else
>     __dt_setup_arch(__dtb_start);
> #endif
> 
> I imagine that if the support is enabled for a target, it should
> be possible to override it with a CMDLINE argument
>     
>     
> They do something similar for the CMDLINE; copying it into the vmlinux, to allow a smaller boot
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-20  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-18 17:59 Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-20  4:23 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2017-11-20  4:32   ` Frank Rowand
2017-11-20 20:19     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-20 21:39       ` Frank Rowand
2017-11-20 23:09         ` Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-21  6:19           ` Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-21 12:02             ` Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-21 17:09         ` Rob Herring
2017-11-21 20:03           ` Ulf Samuelsson
2017-11-20 11:44   ` Mark Rutland
2017-11-20 16:38     ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0f9d598-04af-fddd-58ad-09db10ec19da@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@emagii.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®