From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysctl: Warn when a clamped sysctl parameter is set out of range
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:33:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a178999f-84f7-db25-2db0-8257208cfc2b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJxj77yH8reSaQDp26D1tEvQVaiuL99uYuukCTc5FbfHA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/20/2018 08:26 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:53:50 -0500 Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Even with clamped sysctl parameters, it is still not that straight
>>> forward to figure out the exact range of those parameters. One may
>>> try to write extreme parameter values to see if they get clamped.
>>> To make it easier, a warning with the expected range will now be
>>> printed in the kernel ring buffer when a clamped sysctl parameter
>>> receives an out of range value.
>> This assumes that do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv() and
>> do_proc_douintvec_minmax_conv() are only ever called by privileged
>> userspace. Because we mustn't give unprivileged applications a way to
>> spam the kernel logs.
>>
>> That's presumably true in the case of the caller you just added, but I
>> don't see what we can do to guarantee this in the future, so perhaps we
>> should add some permission check to the pr_warn()?
> How about pr_warn_ratelimited() instead?
>
> -Kees
>
My current thinking is to issue at most one warning per sysctl parameter
as additional warning of the same kind does not provide additional
information.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 16:53 [PATCH 0/3] ipc: Clamp msgmni and shmmni to the real IPC_MNI limit Waiman Long
2018-02-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] sysctl: Add range clamping intvec helper functions Waiman Long
2018-02-20 23:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-02-21 16:58 ` Waiman Long
2018-02-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] sysctl: Warn when a clamped sysctl parameter is set out of range Waiman Long
2018-02-20 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2018-02-20 23:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-02-21 1:26 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-21 15:33 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-02-21 15:24 ` Waiman Long
2018-02-19 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] ipc: Clamp msgmni and shmmni to the real IPC_MNI limit Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a178999f-84f7-db25-2db0-8257208cfc2b@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®