From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Anton Gary Ceph <agaceph@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: improve ipv4 performances
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:49:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a18770ce-9c53-5b02-b259-bba149883187@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180401183121.13022-1-agaceph@gmail.com>
On 04/01/2018 11:31 AM, Anton Gary Ceph wrote:
> As the Linux networking stack is growing, more and more protocols are
> added, increasing the complexity of stack itself.
> Modern processors, contrary to common belief, are very bad in branch
> prediction, so it's our task to give hints to the compiler when possible.
>
> After a few profiling and analysis, turned out that the ethertype field
> of the packets has the following distribution:
>
> 92.1% ETH_P_IP
> 3.2% ETH_P_ARP
> 2.7% ETH_P_8021Q
> 1.4% ETH_P_PPP_SES
> 0.6% don't know/no opinion
>
> From a projection on statistics collected by Google about IPv6 adoption[1],
> IPv6 should peak at 25% usage at the beginning of 2030. Hence, we should
> give proper hints to the compiler about the low IPv6 usage.
>
> Here is an iperf3 run before and after the patch:
>
> Before:
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
> [ 4] 0.00-100.00 sec 100 GBytes 8.60 Gbits/sec 0 sender
> [ 4] 0.00-100.00 sec 100 GBytes 8.60 Gbits/sec receiver
>
> After
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
> [ 4] 0.00-100.00 sec 109 GBytes 9.35 Gbits/sec 0 sender
> [ 4] 0.00-100.00 sec 109 GBytes 9.35 Gbits/sec receiver
>
These iperf3 numbers are simply telling something is wrong in your measures or your hardware.
By the time linux kernels with this patch reach hosts, they will likely use IPv6 anyway.
Please do not tell the compiler that IPv6 should be slowed down in favor of IPv4.
Instead, work on removing IPv4 stack from linux kernel (making it a module)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-01 18:31 Anton Gary Ceph
2018-04-01 18:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-02 0:51 ` Md. Islam
2018-04-02 4:49 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-04-02 7:57 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-03 14:18 ` Douglas Caetano dos Santos
2018-04-04 12:34 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a18770ce-9c53-5b02-b259-bba149883187@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=agaceph@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome