From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794069982; b=RNh5wlnikh9hM3seg2Z9rq3Aq6CChwRFgLX+d1XOmgd7u8hxwgTTlYK6N9/f4bWCDX8D 8Rr2a8XT4yPBOCIwTx78INEIEj1C7kQQObdDVxtE/dHRozuDhikn9RUIlQguHifU76nYm pWx5PsH9uPJ+2fm9NjGe102vbuBpEO+RvGAiKo3XpoNeB/91jx76DIoU8K6WRtYvqx8kX Kc+AAHotmi5H93myO32zKbOT/UQmEEPRvPI8XIHopzfhQGFvqZeGhCOoycFmUCrBLUVHI S5e4AUKqWru1d91AAsQ/8thkTo9alggZBZcUb9AeeNFN8qHf7lrQjya1UliDYFi1ApQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794069982; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received:X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause:X-ME-Proxy:Feedback-ID:Received:X-Mailer: MIME-Version:X-ThreadId:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To: References:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=iQPFcguwJfJnGIUghj3vW2cnp0ZTKsyoI6OiYKG+trA=; b=fjRHb47nKLsx1wy1GbPkMEGR+EqiDglnweWrt0G3kqWF6H6XFzloVWk/bzNBZH5uf7bk UDCg3OdSbJP/VDllYKt7b+K6TcV7nY7HnaGFou/njEUEU9X1grDttckHl2jhp1Fuhr/05 QCDNWPOMcGhf4AVOrPSNSsYliKmETEaSSAw25ivGnDQwJA+kl8u/h9mbRf0sKrTTN6vqG SsiiugnK5x0zK5x1fcUTXw4xtlFEtCtI7NOkALdfCMrHxPlH5SzVCmOpg8i/328Z286fp Ta/8tGPrZiG09C0WYDOZgp8CCwY+RpbdsbWIn/g/okvTnZRHSlTjLJK2rEvUAvsfk9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=VM9YuiWn; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCAE606D80F; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 16:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=VM9YuiWn Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54C841F008A6; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 16:46:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794069982; bh=iQPFcguwJfJnGIUghj3vW2cnp0ZTKsyoI6OiYKG+trA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=VM9YuiWnX2AxixylKQUoq+kcitnOG5EzbF2X9QExC8KlL2MDA2iyK+MohWy7Is5c9 XVSDhAm8H/yBVlmhN+3IQseSQF2jGl1M+I2ez83FRgJrdtIoEzyyJH3UteHcMNBF3J CIxYy49tvs705sBEv6+oNmDe+XeTRlWWJAeIlasE4z+WjzM0vX46Vs29hEnM0d2wZb W1dkb+g9MV6DZn1boZSIdWYUouaQYtnA2TMkW/lFIttT5mLiUtyZmeYkxA+HrJ549d 6AW15GkyWYPIpCmvFv4xURMQ9MDEdEzTK3dhB19k8mh2nE5zuDwmhWf+JnyyfSm3ph PLuUxIL3o5qoA== Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfauth.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1DEF40067; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 11:46:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-imap-15 ([10.202.2.104]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:46:19 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTEtlYS0+TY9rHJo1vCDNDBgG/0TlQu1ZgAaexztyT5e7mSb39t8Qfa0vTeatlfpwP 5ATotugI+S69Aq5UXpsB8wdUtjDvDqFpA717Gwij4u69sZUh6KSv9WWk6Jq//TgMNLfNVi Uz7LSIH08qzFkhYYh9/35LIN1zJWwwarlCDU1iQg4wt21opJj09VkTQ37+xtOv284TX8B8 yl81LC5xmVZyo6A9GjLU5A0F5I2dYlaICl6rU5kYsMelZGpwWY/AOYhI+JMNgaonKgFQaK ku+gQcY5aJl2LKRp0R1zioHZwwCKpV/Rgf4D5rEiKrG8xxXM/BULju0eld0dqqIZyyKUfJ GW19ru42mbqsCpPSyXWqDBJxl5bN5OUlD62byk006CGbw520QKU/yBNHckj8/a7Aw/pswE cEiGWvUnIlIDfqqhyBtbUxKdieVFtOg/Nh7ULYvIP/0NmKpXY6WcXU9anidEQ88SbIQjDc p8Yn7T3r8Bo4iwmbKTgS1vVIcIOOKv75MyWqZv/+HCroxzEXbbFU7dyYNipmhzrf5va650 CqAuf2hfcDqsbABPPTHxkCEDCl/Z7jZw9/P1SXCFxyI0OJaeowmrBr44zHzsSCW7ueEBOE v4mcadw/NREalORTbhxI6N8vjS1sruRGJ2ATEo0TnxHIE3AAjUR+ONXu5PSg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ifa6e4810:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5E62D782738; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 11:46:19 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: AjxZksNfZZQV Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:45:59 -0500 From: "Chuck Lever" To: "Christian Brauner" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Jann Horn" , "Josef Bacik" , "Chris Mason" , "Jeff Layton" , NeilBrown , "Eric Dumazet" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Alexander Viro" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Joel Granados" , "Kees Cook" , "Jan Kara" , "Jan Kara" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Linuxppc Dev" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, "Takashi Iwai" , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20261104-work-procfs-net-v2-10-221e2437fed1@kernel.org> References: <20261104-work-procfs-net-v2-0-221e2437fed1@kernel.org> <20261104-work-procfs-net-v2-10-221e2437fed1@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 10/13] SUNRPC: let procfs own the wait queue of the procfs channel files Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Nov 4, 2026, at 4:13 PM, Christian Brauner wrote: > cache_poll() sleeps the poller on queue_wait, which went back to being > a static queue so that a poll() on a procfs channel file can't be left > on the queue of a cache_detail that its network namespace freed. procfs > owns the queue poll() uses now and it outlives the file, so the procfs > channel files leave the poll_wait() to procfs and an upcall wakes their > pollers through proc_poll_notify(). The channel entry is remembered in > the cache_detail for that and forgotten before the entries are removed. > The rpc_pipefs files keep sleeping on queue_wait, procfs has nothing to > do with them. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) > --- Acked-by: Chuck Lever -- Chuck Lever (Come to NFS bake-a-thon! https://nfsv4bat.org)