From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F3523AB8D; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 01:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770167680; cv=none; b=LKmvha3h2ftPwFTEzqKZuW+tlH56GmD/yX30qkg93++k1aKCiCrTZ/ph/Z2rotl0I6+HMWZpYlqLGWiJZN8mKlZ8GWJEtppk9UZSjpprT6juk5QqsPYDfMINLZDQNDiWhTm+bzOvFIj4ZCScmAdvFY9gddPrixQvQBm/dJDTi6I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770167680; c=relaxed/simple; bh=00nfPGyTtc8tXm9bcLTfP0n/oJ3YOvF8pB/jtPDLcHM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tmcLjmYERAjzfLh2ouxXXRUju0aEYp40J/73/uoRoIPTjGUVdPhILqZaPGXw0k0cljgkLOg6hnU6n2FJHMpaFi27fNmvqW6U50Xn6RmaeOrML0i4M05hZN2Qfwfw9eyLdmxAZnqKQzseaX3JhG3MxUWBoqhL9vuzFgikYN/J0QM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=wZ7gQZbd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="wZ7gQZbd" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=Sab77aD3NRaoRo9PD9BOaCGAGHr4ZUPWfgWJALWIRPg=; b=wZ7gQZbdRK1+GZJS0jqOE3vl4vndzym+EBkMx/e87JCQYlMowNqiiWFcFFSOLsIodNDjDP7VH Pbf6sr2gRUP2LA39TVUIGDKMjf5xKd0XjR+qKjsbVrgUGRo0+8feiw2xtUjSeNAl8zXJCQVGVWv edQ7DVAwewg5jGt33bT1164= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.104]) by canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4f5Mhn016vzRhXJ; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:10:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D26A4056A; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:14:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:14:32 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:14:31 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Gleixner , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20260203133728.848283-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <87bji552uk.ffs@tglx> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: <87bji552uk.ffs@tglx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.67) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) On 2026/2/3 22:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03 2026 at 21:37, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >> Currently, x86, Riscv, Loongarch use the Generic Entry which makes >> maintainers' work easier and codes more elegant. arm64 has already >> successfully switched to the Generic IRQ Entry in commit >> b3cf07851b6c ("arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry"), it is >> time to completely convert arm64 to Generic Entry. >> >> The goal is to bring arm64 in line with other architectures that already >> use the generic entry infrastructure, reducing duplicated code and >> making it easier to share future changes in entry/exit paths, such as >> "Syscall User Dispatch". >> >> This patch set is rebased on "sched/core". And the performance > > Why are you using sched/core, which contains a lot of unrelated > changes. core/entry is the one which has the prerequisites and nothing > else.... Sorry for misunderstanding your v11 reply—however, these patches can still be applied directly to the core/entry branch. Thanks, Jinjie > >