From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:17:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a258094d-91c8-de56-7faa-28862a6f927f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310144709.1542910-1-robh@kernel.org>
On 2023-03-10 14:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
Oh, neat!
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 2ff7a72cf377..d0843caf8760 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev,
> int err;
>
> np = dev_get_dev_node(dev);
> - if (!np || !of_find_property(np, "#stream-id-cells", NULL)) {
> + if (!np || !of_property_present(np, "#stream-id-cells")) {
> of_node_put(np);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> index bdf1a4e5eae0..f4470303d906 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * the lack of has_cache_leaf_nodes flag or renesas,ipmmu-main property.
> */
> if (!mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes ||
> - !of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main", NULL))
> + !of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main"))
On reflection, weird that this works the way it does instead of actually
following the phandle, but oh well. Definitely beyond the scope of this
cleanup :)
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> mmu->root = mmu;
> else
> mmu->root = ipmmu_find_root();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring
2023-03-10 16:17 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-03-22 13:55 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a258094d-91c8-de56-7faa-28862a6f927f@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®