From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] IB/isert: Replace semaphore sem with completion
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a267cc5e-4d4f-368e-a159-3eecc2187969@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477551554-30349-6-git-send-email-binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
> The semaphore 'sem' in isert_device is used as completion, so convert
> it to struct completion. Semaphores are going away in the future.
Umm, this is 100% *not* true. np->sem is designed as a counting to
sync the iscsi login thread with the connect requests coming from the
initiators. So this is actually a reliable bug insertion :(
NAK from me...
Also, I would appreciate if you include get_maintainer.pl in your
patch submissions so I won't need to fish these in the Linux-rdma
patch traffic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-30 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 6:59 [PATCH v4 00/10] infiniband: Remove semaphores Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] IB/core: iwpm_nlmsg_request: Replace semaphore with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] IB/core: Replace semaphore sm_sem with an atomic wait Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] IB/hns: Replace semaphore poll_sem with mutex Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] IB/isert: Replace semaphore sem with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-30 21:12 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-11-18 6:57 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-11-18 8:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-18 9:10 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] IB/mlx5: Add helper mlx5_ib_post_send_wait Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] IB/mlx5: Replace semaphore umr_common:sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] IB/mlx5: Simplify completion into a wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-30 21:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-11-02 15:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-11-03 6:03 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-11-03 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-07 5:51 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 7:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] infiniband: Remove semaphores Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a267cc5e-4d4f-368e-a159-3eecc2187969@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®