From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbmem: copy_from/to_user() with mutex held (v2)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2776ec50901200021y7583fa40h71d2ea56c89c44a6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119215427.7f23a76f.krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:04:04 +0100
> Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Avoid to call copy_from/to_user() with fb_info->lock mutex held in fbmem
>> ioctl().
>>
>> fb_mmap() is called under mm->mmap_sem (A) held, that also acquires
>> fb_info->lock (B); fb_ioctl() takes fb_info->lock (B) and does
>> copy_from/to_user() that might acquire mm->mmap_sem (A), causing a
>> deadlock.
>>
>> NOTE: it doesn't push down the fb_info->lock in each own driver's
>> fb_ioctl(), so there're still potential deadlocks somewhere.
>>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
>> index 756efeb..fe6033e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
>> @@ -1013,25 +1013,26 @@ static long do_fb_ioctl(struct fb_info *info, unsigned int cmd,
> (...)
>> case FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:
>> - if (copy_from_user(&var, argp, sizeof(var))) {
>> - ret = -EFAULT;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> + if (copy_from_user(&var, argp, sizeof(var)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + if (!lock_fb_info(info))
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> acquire_console_sem();
>> info->flags |= FBINFO_MISC_USEREVENT;
>> ret = fb_set_var(info, &var);
>> @@ -1041,104 +1042,109 @@ static long do_fb_ioctl(struct fb_info *info, unsigned int cmd,
>> ret = -EFAULT;
>> break;
>
> I don't see a call to unlock_fb_info(info) in the case for FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO.
> Is it intentional?
No, it's a bug :(. I'll post a new patch soon.
Thanks for reviewing!
-Andrea
>
> Kind regards,
> Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-19 11:04 Andrea Righi
2009-01-19 20:54 ` Krzysztof Helt
2009-01-20 8:21 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2776ec50901200021y7583fa40h71d2ea56c89c44a6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.h1@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®