From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/4] cpuset: remove redundant CS_ONLINE flag
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 21:00:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a27c39d5-7470-475e-aefa-0841bd816675@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <775ef75a-b796-4171-b208-df110a73c558@huaweicloud.com>
On 8/12/25 8:54 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>
> On 2025/8/12 22:44, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 8/8/25 5:25 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>>> From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> The CS_ONLINE flag was introduced prior to the CSS_ONLINE flag in the
>>> cpuset subsystem. Currently, the flag setting sequence is as follows:
>>>
>>> 1. cpuset_css_online() sets CS_ONLINE
>>> 2. css->flags gets CSS_ONLINE set
>>> ...
>>> 3. cgroup->kill_css sets CSS_DYING
>>> 4. cpuset_css_offline() clears CS_ONLINE
>>> 5. css->flags clears CSS_ONLINE
>>>
>>> The is_cpuset_online() check currently occurs between steps 1 and 3.
>>> However, it would be equally safe to perform this check between steps 2
>>> and 3, as CSS_ONLINE provides the same synchronization guarantee as
>>> CS_ONLINE.
>>>
>>> Since CS_ONLINE is redundant with CSS_ONLINE and provides no additional
>>> synchronization benefits, we can safely remove it to simplify the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 +++++
>>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h | 3 +--
>>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 4 +---
>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
>>> index b18fb5fcb38e..ae73dbb19165 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
>>> @@ -354,6 +354,11 @@ static inline bool css_is_dying(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>> return css->flags & CSS_DYING;
>>> }
>>> +static inline bool css_is_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>> +{
>>> + return css->flags & CSS_ONLINE;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static inline bool css_is_self(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>> {
>>> if (css == &css->cgroup->self) {
>>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
>>> index 383963e28ac6..75b3aef39231 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
>>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset-internal.h
>>> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ enum prs_errcode {
>>> /* bits in struct cpuset flags field */
>>> typedef enum {
>>> - CS_ONLINE,
>>> CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE,
>>> CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE,
>>> CS_MEM_HARDWALL,
>>> @@ -202,7 +201,7 @@ static inline struct cpuset *parent_cs(struct cpuset *cs)
>>> /* convenient tests for these bits */
>>> static inline bool is_cpuset_online(struct cpuset *cs)
>>> {
>>> - return test_bit(CS_ONLINE, &cs->flags) && !css_is_dying(&cs->css);
>>> + return css_is_online(&cs->css) && !css_is_dying(&cs->css);
>>> }
>>> static inline int is_cpu_exclusive(const struct cpuset *cs)
>>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> index f74d04429a29..cf7cd2255265 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static inline void notify_partition_change(struct cpuset *cs, int old_prs)
>>> * parallel, we may leave an offline CPU in cpu_allowed or some other masks.
>>> */
>>> static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
>>> - .flags = BIT(CS_ONLINE) | BIT(CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE) |
>>> + .flags = BIT(CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE) |
>>> BIT(CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE) | BIT(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE),
>>> .partition_root_state = PRS_ROOT,
>>> .relax_domain_level = -1,
>> top_cpuset.css is not initialized like the one in the children. If you modify is_cpuset_online() to
>> test the css.flags, you will probably need to set the CSS_ONLINE flag in top_cpuset.css.flags. I do
>> doubt that we will apply the is_cpuset_online() test on top_cpuset. To be consistent, we should
>> support that.
>>
>> BTW, other statically allocated css'es in the cgroup root may have similar problem. If you make the
>> css_is_online() helper available to all other controllers, you will have to document that limitation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Longman
> Hi, Longman, thank you for your response.
>
> If I understand correctly, the CSS_ONLINE flag should be set in top_cpuset.css during the following
> process:
>
> css_create
> css = ss->css_alloc(parent_css); // cgroup root is static, unlike children
> online_css(css);
> ret = ss->css_online(css); // css root may differ from children
> css->flags |= CSS_ONLINE; // css.flags is set with CSS_ONLINE, including the root css
>
> I think css online must be successful, and it's CSS_ONLINE flag must be set. Do I missing anything?
I am talking about just the top_cpuset which is statically allocated. It
is not created by the css_create() call and so the CSS_ONLINE will not
be set.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 9:25 [PATCH -next 0/4] some optimization for cpuset Chen Ridong
2025-08-08 9:25 ` [PATCH -next 1/4] cpuset: remove redundant CS_ONLINE flag Chen Ridong
2025-08-12 14:44 ` Waiman Long
2025-08-13 0:54 ` Chen Ridong
2025-08-13 1:00 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-08-13 1:20 ` Chen Ridong
2025-08-13 1:33 ` Waiman Long
2025-08-13 6:28 ` Chen Ridong
2025-08-08 9:25 ` [PATCH -next 2/4] cpuset: add helpers for cpuset related locks Chen Ridong
2025-08-09 15:56 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-08-11 2:17 ` Chen Ridong
2025-08-08 9:25 ` [PATCH -next 3/4] cpuset: use guard_cpus_read_and_cpuset to make code concise Chen Ridong
2025-08-08 9:25 ` [PATCH -next 4/4] cpuset: replace cpuset_lock() with guard_cpuset() Chen Ridong
2025-08-08 22:02 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a27c39d5-7470-475e-aefa-0841bd816675@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®