Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Add compatible for AM64

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>]

On 23/11/2021 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
> AM64 SoC contains the GPMC module. Add compatible for it.
> 
> Newer SoCs don't necessarily map GPMC data region at the same place
> as legacy SoCs. Add reg-names "data", to provide this information to
> the device driver.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml         | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
> index 25b42d68f9b3..1869cc6f949b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
> @@ -23,13 +23,20 @@ properties:
>      items:
>        - enum:
>            - ti,am3352-gpmc
> +          - ti,am64-gpmc
>            - ti,omap2420-gpmc
>            - ti,omap2430-gpmc
>            - ti,omap3430-gpmc
>            - ti,omap4430-gpmc
>  
>    reg:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: cfg
> +      - const: data

I see your driver handles cases with only one reg item, but I have other
question - is it correct to have older (ARMv7) platform with two reg
items? Or can am64-gpmc come with only one reg?
IOW, I am surprised there is no if-else case precising this minItems
requirement for different SocS.

>  
>    interrupts:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -44,6 +51,9 @@ properties:
>      items:
>        - const: fck
>  
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 1

Similar, but looks like a weaker requirement - could an older SoC define
power-domain?

> +
>    dmas:
>      items:
>        - description: DMA channel for GPMC NAND prefetch
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof