From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A821E3C10B9; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790012417; cv=none; b=omTo9SSRADtpGvJTqTxd740/fC38JfP4PW3wiqkI9DCAgW01XaFpQnH9Wks8LwUBGzXoXg3zqQR0EhMeRQvK235vmiksJOLlBQGkoV2uwLoOyTicSTa8cFVbLhmGznUWsepPqa9EhGQZTWK1UvRATzh4KMk1cQIXa+KJdwjWlWw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790012417; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jD1Ry46DGVBPEXo6cyCks+UGuJM0O7YxIFBNv0kjY3Q=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=p6TQakz9kDfyzvkH9NpP6eYvdBMm5EpO9zcRwnK5DsxjF8qbcTFJGGOgW1fF7y7jrS+KtXxNPFhDQFsuBNApgUj/qV+NgS+LOQSOdvydQm97cU03nxstSVqeSTkgVRFGna8WGlVQDulDcKZ/eslAADiVsF/A7CzjSnqnVEW4T4s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PK/YEveJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PK/YEveJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87811F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:40:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790012416; bh=jD1Ry46DGVBPEXo6cyCks+UGuJM0O7YxIFBNv0kjY3Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=PK/YEveJf6qjG64ztoZ5i/O/cyfiRIBZNtDbNobQodpaxCPEvB332s+j3pF5+Ljn8 qCbyl6gwYku78q3IjiAoU4uG5hR71lf4cMrz5jTgO6zGflTjKoeflKSiezcJ52wCCN HbKRdeeOyg3F0gRTXu8095HbC9JpL0aWA7VAxVwApSs+y8V6eaBgx6AyxiyIiclIeS 0c1x/43XGnTghUT2JNaqzSN+BDYLLAu0fAgwdygo5M9dl+DHgFsLz3Ce6uA6sps7zt rW/6y1EJTQnYtEBRmWGm4+I6RE0zUnLojuD8FvKKZCADWt4qjAoAi1pKemMi9AXrXZ Kms4/t3OCBXrw== Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 07:40:15 -1000 Message-ID: From: Tejun Heo To: Usama Arif Cc: arighi@nvidia.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, bsegall@google.com, changwoo@igalia.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, etsal@meta.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, void@manifault.com, vschneid@redhat.com, yphbchou0911@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Specialize the DSQ hashtable compare In-Reply-To: <20260921171928.1639407-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> References: <20260921171928.1639407-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Applied to sched_ext/for-7.4 with the dsq_cmpfn() signature joined onto one line. scx_tid_hash and scx_sched_hash have the same u64 key and also fall back to rhashtable_compare(). scx_bpf_tid_to_task() sits on hot paths too. Do you want to do the same for them as a follow-up? Thanks. -- tejun