From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034441AbcIWNmO (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:42:14 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:59828 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965693AbcIWNmM (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:42:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] armv8: aarch32: Execute 32-bit Linux for LayerScape platforms To: Stuart Yoder , Alison Wang , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , Fabio Estevam Estevam , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Scott Wood , Leo Li References: <1474597146-33312-1-git-send-email-b18965@freescale.com> Cc: Robin Murphy , Sudeep Holla , Jason Jin From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:42:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/09/16 14:18, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 23/09/16 14:13, Stuart Yoder wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> Which arch/arm/mach-* platform are you using for Juno? > > I don't even know! :) I just start with a multi_v7_defconfig plus a few > extra bits (LPAE, KVM, sil24, sky2, etc.) and it works. I guess it's the > combination of mach-vexpress and mach-virt. > It should be matching "arm,vexpress" and just using mach-vexpress/v2m.c as it's present as compatible in Juno DT but nothing else there. mach-virt was deleted and we just have "Generic DT based system" in arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c which IIUC doesn't require any compatible in the DT. So dropping "arm,vexpress" will make it use "Generic DT based system" I believe. -- Regards, Sudeep