From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the kunit-next tree
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:17:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2b3ede8-0cc8-45d2-9841-0d8d460cf021@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alrCeerj_TmaqUuP@sirena.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1261 bytes --]
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 01:02:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> After merging the kunit-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (arm64 kunit) failed like this:
> [23:00:36] # gpio_unbind_with_consumers: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c:393
> [23:00:36] Expected ret == 0x0001, but
> [23:00:36] ret == 0 (0x0)
> [23:00:36] 0x0001 == 1 (0x1)
> [23:00:36] [FAILED] gpio_unbind_with_consumers
> [23:00:36] # module: gpiolib_kunit
> This is caused by commit
> a05cfd98c5eca (gpio: kunit: add test cases for software node hogs)
> which was from the gpio-brgl tree, it has only just become visible since
> 34b5c0132952c (kunit: configs: enable GPIO kunit test cases in all_tests.config)
> was added causing the gpiolib tests to actually be run though neither of
> these commits was added today (the KUnit tree did not change for a
> while). I'm not clear why this has started failing today, presumably
> some third commit from another tree has started triggering a regression
> since neither of these trees has changed.
> I have left this for today.
This issue has now reoccurred, the KUnit tree landed in mainline but
none of the gpiolib changes did including presumably whatever fix David
mentioned.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-18 0:02 Mark Brown
2026-07-20 9:01 ` David Gow
2026-07-21 14:41 ` Shuah Khan
2026-07-21 14:45 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-18 19:17 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2b3ede8-0cc8-45d2-9841-0d8d460cf021@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®