From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639DAC04EB8 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A1E21479 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:40:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32A1E21479 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729228AbeLFIkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 03:40:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35372 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728941AbeLFIkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 03:40:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528E95276F; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nostromo.localnet (ovpn-204-252.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.252]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1305060CD1; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for synthetic uevents To: Greg KH Cc: rafael@kernel.org, jeyu@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, msekleta@redhat.com References: <20181205112745.12276-1-prajnoha@redhat.com> <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com> From: Peter Rajnoha Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:40:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dňa 5. 12. 2018 o 17:30 Greg KH napísal(a): > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Peter Rajnoha wrote: >> Two small patches to aid handling of synthetic uevents back in userspace: >> >> - Return error code back to userspace on /sys/.../uevent file write >> failure so userspace knows and it can act accordingly. >> >> - Add new 'kernel/uevent_features' sysfs file to make it possible for >> userspace to check that the extended synthetic uevent arguments are >> supported without relying on kernel version check only. >> >> Peter Rajnoha (2): >> kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails >> kobject: add kernel/uevent_features sysfs file > > Did you send this series twice? Which one should I pay attention to? > > confused, > > greg k-h > They're same, I just sent it again because I forgot to add the LKML list with the first one. So please take the latter one with that list on CC. Sorry for the confusion. -- Peter