mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:52:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2d0226d-818a-67f4-57d4-4f20b6edb8b3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404141805.GA12903@kernel.org>



On 4/4/2017 10:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Adding the perf kernel maintainers to the CC list.
>
> Em Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:18:38PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>> It is often useful to know the branch types while analyzing branch
>> data. For example, a call is very different from a conditional branch.
>>
>> Currently we have to look it up in binary while the binary may later
>> not be available and even the binary is available but user has to take
>> some time. It is very useful for user to check it directly in perf
>> report.
>>
>> Perf already has support for disassembling the branch instruction
>> to get the branch type. The branch type is defined in lbr.c.
>>
>> To keep consistent on kernel and userspace and make the classification
>> more common, the patch adds the common branch type classification
>> in perf_event.h.
>>
>> Since the disassembling of branch instruction needs some overhead,
>> a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE is introduced to indicate if it
>> needs to disassemble the branch instruction and record the branch
>> type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h       | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index d09a9cd..4d731fd 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift {
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT	= 14, /* no flags */
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT	= 15, /* no cycles */
>>   
>> +	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT	= 16, /* save branch type */
>> +
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT		/* non-ABI */
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -198,9 +200,27 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS	= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT,
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES	= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT,
>>   
>> +	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE	=
>> +		1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT,
>> +
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX		= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT,
>>   };
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Common flow change classification
>> + */
>> +enum {
>> +	PERF_BR_NONE		= 0,		/* unknown */
>> +	PERF_BR_JCC_FWD		= 1 << 1,	/* conditional forward jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_JCC_BWD		= 1 << 2,	/* conditional backward jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_JMP		= 1 << 3,	/* jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_IND_JMP		= 1 << 4,	/* indirect jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_CALL		= 1 << 5,	/* call */
>> +	PERF_BR_IND_CALL	= 1 << 6,	/* indirect call */
>> +	PERF_BR_RET		= 1 << 7,	/* return */
>> +	PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH	= 1 << 8,	/* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
> Humm, wouldn't be better to have those in separate buckets? I.e.
>
>    PERF_BR_SYSCALL
>    PERF_BR_SYSRET,
>    PERF_BR_IRQ
>
> etc?

There are also other types. I.e. abort, ..... I use FAR_BRANCH is 
because I just want to differentiate between basic branch types and 
others. (others may be too much and platform specific).

>
> And why a bitmask? /me reads a bit more...  couldn't find a reason for
> this:
>
> +             type:9,     /* branch type */
>
> Do you have a reason to use 9 bits? Why not just:
>
> enum {
> 	PERF_BR_NONE		= 0,	/* unknown */
> 	PERF_BR_JCC_FWD		= 1,	/* conditional forward jump */
> 	PERF_BR_JCC_BWD		= 2,	/* conditional backward jump */
> 	PERF_BR_JMP		= 3,	/* jump */
> 	PERF_BR_IND_JMP		= 4,	/* indirect jump */
> 	PERF_BR_CALL		= 5,	/* call */
> 	PERF_BR_IND_CALL	= 6,	/* indirect call */
> 	PERF_BR_RET		= 7,	/* return */
> 	PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH	= 8,	/* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
>
> And then use, say, 4 or 5 bits for that type field?
>
> I must be missing something trivial ;-\
>
> - Arnaldo

You are right. I made things more complicated. Yes, the definitions 
should be clear and simple. I will redefine them in v2.

Thanks
Jin Yao

>
>> +};
>> +
>>   #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
>>   	(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
>>   	 PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\
>> @@ -999,6 +1019,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>    *     in_tx: running in a hardware transaction
>>    *     abort: aborting a hardware transaction
>>    *    cycles: cycles from last branch (or 0 if not supported)
>> + *      type: branch type
>>    */
>>   struct perf_branch_entry {
>>   	__u64	from;
>> @@ -1008,7 +1029,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
>>   		in_tx:1,    /* in transaction */
>>   		abort:1,    /* transaction abort */
>>   		cycles:16,  /* cycle count to last branch */
>> -		reserved:44;
>> +		type:9,     /* branch type */
>> +		reserved:35;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index d09a9cd..4d731fd 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift {
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT	= 14, /* no flags */
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT	= 15, /* no cycles */
>>   
>> +	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT	= 16, /* save branch type */
>> +
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT		/* non-ABI */
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -198,9 +200,27 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS	= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT,
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES	= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT,
>>   
>> +	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE	=
>> +		1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT,
>> +
>>   	PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX		= 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT,
>>   };
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Common flow change classification
>> + */
>> +enum {
>> +	PERF_BR_NONE		= 0,		/* unknown */
>> +	PERF_BR_JCC_FWD		= 1 << 1,	/* conditional forward jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_JCC_BWD		= 1 << 2,	/* conditional backward jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_JMP		= 1 << 3,	/* jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_IND_JMP		= 1 << 4,	/* indirect jump */
>> +	PERF_BR_CALL		= 1 << 5,	/* call */
>> +	PERF_BR_IND_CALL	= 1 << 6,	/* indirect call */
>> +	PERF_BR_RET		= 1 << 7,	/* return */
>> +	PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH	= 1 << 8,	/* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
>> +};
>> +
>>   #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
>>   	(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
>>   	 PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\
>> @@ -999,6 +1019,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>>    *     in_tx: running in a hardware transaction
>>    *     abort: aborting a hardware transaction
>>    *    cycles: cycles from last branch (or 0 if not supported)
>> + *      type: branch type
>>    */
>>   struct perf_branch_entry {
>>   	__u64	from;
>> @@ -1008,7 +1029,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
>>   		in_tx:1,    /* in transaction */
>>   		abort:1,    /* transaction abort */
>>   		cycles:16,  /* cycle count to last branch */
>> -		reserved:44;
>> +		type:9,     /* branch type */
>> +		reserved:35;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-04 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 15:18 [PATCH v1 0/5] perf report: Show branch type Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification Jin Yao
2017-04-04 14:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-04-04 15:52     ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2017-04-04 16:09       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-04-06  0:09         ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06  6:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06  8:21       ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06  9:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 14:43           ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06 16:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-07  2:14               ` Jin, Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] perf record: Create a new option save_type in --branch-filter Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] perf report: Show branch type statistics for stdio mode Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] perf report: Show branch type in callchain entry Jin Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2d0226d-818a-67f4-57d4-4f20b6edb8b3@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome