From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:52:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2d0226d-818a-67f4-57d4-4f20b6edb8b3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404141805.GA12903@kernel.org>
On 4/4/2017 10:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Adding the perf kernel maintainers to the CC list.
>
> Em Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:18:38PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>> It is often useful to know the branch types while analyzing branch
>> data. For example, a call is very different from a conditional branch.
>>
>> Currently we have to look it up in binary while the binary may later
>> not be available and even the binary is available but user has to take
>> some time. It is very useful for user to check it directly in perf
>> report.
>>
>> Perf already has support for disassembling the branch instruction
>> to get the branch type. The branch type is defined in lbr.c.
>>
>> To keep consistent on kernel and userspace and make the classification
>> more common, the patch adds the common branch type classification
>> in perf_event.h.
>>
>> Since the disassembling of branch instruction needs some overhead,
>> a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE is introduced to indicate if it
>> needs to disassemble the branch instruction and record the branch
>> type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index d09a9cd..4d731fd 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift {
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT = 14, /* no flags */
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT = 15, /* no cycles */
>>
>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT = 16, /* save branch type */
>> +
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT /* non-ABI */
>> };
>>
>> @@ -198,9 +200,27 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT,
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT,
>>
>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
>> + 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT,
>> +
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT,
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Common flow change classification
>> + */
>> +enum {
>> + PERF_BR_NONE = 0, /* unknown */
>> + PERF_BR_JCC_FWD = 1 << 1, /* conditional forward jump */
>> + PERF_BR_JCC_BWD = 1 << 2, /* conditional backward jump */
>> + PERF_BR_JMP = 1 << 3, /* jump */
>> + PERF_BR_IND_JMP = 1 << 4, /* indirect jump */
>> + PERF_BR_CALL = 1 << 5, /* call */
>> + PERF_BR_IND_CALL = 1 << 6, /* indirect call */
>> + PERF_BR_RET = 1 << 7, /* return */
>> + PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH = 1 << 8, /* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
> Humm, wouldn't be better to have those in separate buckets? I.e.
>
> PERF_BR_SYSCALL
> PERF_BR_SYSRET,
> PERF_BR_IRQ
>
> etc?
There are also other types. I.e. abort, ..... I use FAR_BRANCH is
because I just want to differentiate between basic branch types and
others. (others may be too much and platform specific).
>
> And why a bitmask? /me reads a bit more... couldn't find a reason for
> this:
>
> + type:9, /* branch type */
>
> Do you have a reason to use 9 bits? Why not just:
>
> enum {
> PERF_BR_NONE = 0, /* unknown */
> PERF_BR_JCC_FWD = 1, /* conditional forward jump */
> PERF_BR_JCC_BWD = 2, /* conditional backward jump */
> PERF_BR_JMP = 3, /* jump */
> PERF_BR_IND_JMP = 4, /* indirect jump */
> PERF_BR_CALL = 5, /* call */
> PERF_BR_IND_CALL = 6, /* indirect call */
> PERF_BR_RET = 7, /* return */
> PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH = 8, /* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
>
> And then use, say, 4 or 5 bits for that type field?
>
> I must be missing something trivial ;-\
>
> - Arnaldo
You are right. I made things more complicated. Yes, the definitions
should be clear and simple. I will redefine them in v2.
Thanks
Jin Yao
>
>> +};
>> +
>> #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
>> (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\
>> @@ -999,6 +1019,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>> * in_tx: running in a hardware transaction
>> * abort: aborting a hardware transaction
>> * cycles: cycles from last branch (or 0 if not supported)
>> + * type: branch type
>> */
>> struct perf_branch_entry {
>> __u64 from;
>> @@ -1008,7 +1029,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
>> in_tx:1, /* in transaction */
>> abort:1, /* transaction abort */
>> cycles:16, /* cycle count to last branch */
>> - reserved:44;
>> + type:9, /* branch type */
>> + reserved:35;
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index d09a9cd..4d731fd 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type_shift {
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT = 14, /* no flags */
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT = 15, /* no cycles */
>>
>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT = 16, /* save branch type */
>> +
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT /* non-ABI */
>> };
>>
>> @@ -198,9 +200,27 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS_SHIFT,
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES_SHIFT,
>>
>> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE =
>> + 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE_SHIFT,
>> +
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX = 1U << PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX_SHIFT,
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Common flow change classification
>> + */
>> +enum {
>> + PERF_BR_NONE = 0, /* unknown */
>> + PERF_BR_JCC_FWD = 1 << 1, /* conditional forward jump */
>> + PERF_BR_JCC_BWD = 1 << 2, /* conditional backward jump */
>> + PERF_BR_JMP = 1 << 3, /* jump */
>> + PERF_BR_IND_JMP = 1 << 4, /* indirect jump */
>> + PERF_BR_CALL = 1 << 5, /* call */
>> + PERF_BR_IND_CALL = 1 << 6, /* indirect call */
>> + PERF_BR_RET = 1 << 7, /* return */
>> + PERF_BR_FAR_BRANCH = 1 << 8, /* SYSCALL,SYSRET,IRQ,... */
>> +};
>> +
>> #define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
>> (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
>> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL|\
>> @@ -999,6 +1019,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>> * in_tx: running in a hardware transaction
>> * abort: aborting a hardware transaction
>> * cycles: cycles from last branch (or 0 if not supported)
>> + * type: branch type
>> */
>> struct perf_branch_entry {
>> __u64 from;
>> @@ -1008,7 +1029,8 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
>> in_tx:1, /* in transaction */
>> abort:1, /* transaction abort */
>> cycles:16, /* cycle count to last branch */
>> - reserved:44;
>> + type:9, /* branch type */
>> + reserved:35;
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PERF_EVENT_H */
>> --
>> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-31 15:18 [PATCH v1 0/5] perf report: Show branch type Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification Jin Yao
2017-04-04 14:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-04-04 15:52 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2017-04-04 16:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-04-06 0:09 ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06 6:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 8:21 ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-06 14:43 ` Jin, Yao
2017-04-06 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-07 2:14 ` Jin, Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] perf record: Create a new option save_type in --branch-filter Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] perf report: Show branch type statistics for stdio mode Jin Yao
2017-03-31 15:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] perf report: Show branch type in callchain entry Jin Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2d0226d-818a-67f4-57d4-4f20b6edb8b3@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome