From: "Dong Feng" <middle.fengdong@gmail.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>,
"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:16:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2ebde260608290916o696bf5d6odbca254af079f2a8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608290908500.18149@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
No, please do not get me wrong. Or perhaps please tolerate my poor English.
My intention is just trying to understand whether there is an absolute
rationality for a design choice or it just has to have a choice and
the choice can be made arbitrarily.
Sorry again if my English cause any misunderstanding.
2006/8/30, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Dong Feng wrote:
>
> > Or perhaps this offset is just some personal favor. Say if the first
> > kernel designer decided to locate kernel at 2-3G linear address, then
> > 2G offset would have appeared in code. Is this the case?
>
> Well this is the second time that you suggest that the reason for
> technical decisions have to do with personal favors. Are you trying to
> provoke us into answering your question?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-29 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-29 14:15 Dong Feng
2006-08-29 14:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-29 14:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-29 16:01 ` Dong Feng
2006-08-29 16:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-29 16:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-29 16:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-29 16:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-08-29 16:16 ` Dong Feng [this message]
2006-08-29 16:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-29 18:37 ` Peter Grandi
2006-08-29 21:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 6:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-30 4:32 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2ebde260608290916o696bf5d6odbca254af079f2a8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=middle.fengdong@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome