mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 11:09:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2ef7773-bec6-466f-81b3-e1d8f6cbe7b6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250730131158.101668-7-gmonaco@redhat.com>


On 7/30/25 9:11 AM, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> Currently the user can set up isolcpus and nohz_full in such a way that
> leaves no housekeeping CPU (i.e. no CPU that is neither domain isolated
> nor nohz full). This can be a problem for other subsystems (e.g. the
> timer wheel imgration).
>
> Prevent this configuration by invalidating the last setting in case the
> union of isolcpus and nohz_full covers all CPUs.
>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/isolation.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 93b038d48900..0019d941de68 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,18 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
>   			}
>   		}
>   
> +		/* Check in combination with the previously set cpumask */
> +		type = find_first_bit(&housekeeping.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX);
> +		first_cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(cpu_present_mask,
> +						  housekeeping_staging,
> +						  housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
> +		if (first_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || first_cpu >= setup_max_cpus) {
> +			pr_warn("Housekeeping: must include one present CPU neither "
> +				"in nohz_full= nor in isolcpus=, ignoring setting %s\n",
> +				str);
> +			goto free_housekeeping_staging;
> +		}
> +
>   		iter_flags = flags & ~housekeeping.flags;
>   
>   		for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)

I do have a question about this check. Currently isolcpus=domain is bit 
0, managed_irq is bit 1 and nohz_full is bit 2. If manage_irq come first 
followed by nohz_full and then isolcpus=domain. By the time, 
isolcpus=domain is being set, you are comparing its cpumask with that of 
manage_irq, not nohz_full.

Perhaps you can reuse the non_housekeeping_mask for doing the check, e.g.

         cpumask_and(non_housekeeping_mask, cpu_present_mask, 
housekeeping_staging);
         iter_flags = housekeeping.flags & ~flags;
         for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
                 cpumask_and(non_housekeeping_mask, 
non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
         if (cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask)) {
                 pr_warn(...

Regards,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-30 13:11 [PATCH v9 0/8] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] timers/migration: Postpone online/offline callbacks registration to late initcall Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] timers: Add the available mask in timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] timers: Use scoped_guard when setting/clearing the tmigr available flag Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to update_exclusion_cpumasks() Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-31 14:42   ` Waiman Long
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-31 15:09   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-08-01 14:46     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-08-01 18:04       ` Waiman Long
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-31 15:39   ` Waiman Long
2025-08-01 16:03     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-30 13:11 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-31 18:25   ` Waiman Long
2025-08-01 13:07     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-08-01 19:15       ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2ef7773-bec6-466f-81b3-e1d8f6cbe7b6@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®