From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Shijie Huang <shijie@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: patches@amperecomputing.com, cl@linux.com,
Shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com, corbet@lwn.net,
paulmck@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, bp@alien8.de,
ardb@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] arm64: refactor the rodata=xxx
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:33:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2f95b96-cc0a-44a4-bd2a-05ba65b39b6a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a18f3b2a-0869-436b-ab20-41a92f1f468a@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
On 09/09/25 10:56 AM, Shijie Huang wrote:
>
> On 09/09/2025 12:29, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 09/09/25 9:02 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> As per admin guide documentation, "rodata=on" should be the default on
>>> platforms. Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt describes
>>> these options as
>>>
>>> rodata= [KNL,EARLY]
>>> on Mark read-only kernel memory as read-only (default).
>>> off Leave read-only kernel memory writable for debugging.
>>> full Mark read-only kernel memory and aliases as read-only
>>> [arm64]
>>>
>>> But on arm64 platform, RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED is enabled by default,
>>> so "rodata=full" is the default instead.
>>>
>>> This patch implements the following changes:
>>> - Make "rodata=on" behaviour same as the original "rodata=full".
>>> This keeps align with the x86.
>>> - Make "rodata=noalias" (new) behaviour same as the original "rodata=on"
>>> - Drop the original "rodata=full"
>>>
>>> After this patch, the "rodata=on" will be the default on arm64 platform
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> Different rodata options may have different performance, so record more
>>> detail information here:
>>>
>>> rodata=on (default)
>>> This applies read-only attributes to VM areas and to the linear
>>> alias of the backing pages as well. This prevents code or read-
>>> only data from being modified (inadvertently or intentionally),
>>> via another mapping for the same memory page.
>>>
>>> But this might cause linear map region to be mapped down to base
>>> pages, which may adversely affect performance in some cases.
>>>
>>> rodata=off
>>> This provides more block mappings and contiguous hints for linear
>>> map region which would minimize TLB footprint. This also leaves
>>> read-only kernel memory writable for debugging.
>>>
>>> rodata=noalias
>>> This provides more block mappings and contiguous hints for linear
>>> map region which would minimize TLB footprint. This leaves the linear
>>> alias of read-only mappings in the vmalloc space writeable, making
>> typo ^^^^^^^^
> What's the typo? It seems "writeable" is okay.
Alright.
>>> them susceptible to inadvertent modification by software.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++--
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/setup.h | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> index db84a629f7b1..138e0db5af64 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> @@ -6418,8 +6418,9 @@
>>> rodata= [KNL,EARLY]
>>> on Mark read-only kernel memory as read-only (default).
>>> off Leave read-only kernel memory writable for debugging.
>>> - full Mark read-only kernel memory and aliases as read-only
>>> - [arm64]
>>> + noalias Mark read-only kernel memory as read-only but retain
>>> + writable aliases in the direct map for regions outside
>>> + of the kernel image. [arm64]
>> Should not the arm64 specific performance implications be mentioned
>> in the above documentation update as well ? But in case this appears
>> too much platform specific - probably do consider adding them above
>> or inside arch_parse_debug_rodata() as an in-code documentation.
>
> Will had already suggested do not add them for the arch_parse_debug_rodata():
>
> https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2025-September/1060135.html
Alright.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 3:32 [PATCH v7 0/2] " Huang Shijie
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Huang Shijie
2025-09-09 4:29 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-09 5:26 ` Shijie Huang
2025-09-09 6:03 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-09-09 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64/Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED Huang Shijie
2025-09-16 21:13 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: refactor the rodata=xxx Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2f95b96-cc0a-44a4-bd2a-05ba65b39b6a@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=Shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shijie@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com \
--cc=shijie@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®