From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] kvm: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:11:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2fd3afe-0345-7275-1bcc-32e7258ccd72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAh4q6ZCOw3qDzHP@google.com>
On 20/01/21 19:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, Ben Gardon wrote:
>> Currently the TDP MMU yield / cond_resched functions either return
>> nothing or return true if the TLBs were not flushed. These are confusing
>> semantics, especially when making control flow decisions in calling
>> functions.
>>
>> To clean things up, change both functions to have the same
>> return value semantics as cond_resched: true if the thread yielded,
>> false if it did not. If the function yielded in the _flush_ version,
>> then the TLBs will have been flushed.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> index 2ef8615f9dba..b2784514ca2d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
>> @@ -413,8 +413,15 @@ static inline void tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
>> _mmu->shadow_root_level, _start, _end)
>>
>> /*
>> - * Flush the TLB if the process should drop kvm->mmu_lock.
>> - * Return whether the caller still needs to flush the tlb.
>> + * Flush the TLB and yield if the MMU lock is contended or this thread needs to
>> + * return control to the scheduler.
>> + *
>> + * If this function yields, it will also reset the tdp_iter's walk over the
>> + * paging structure and the calling function should allow the iterator to
>> + * continue its traversal from the paging structure root.
>> + *
>> + * Return true if this function yielded, the TLBs were flushed, and the
>> + * iterator's traversal was reset. Return false if a yield was not needed.
>> */
>> static bool tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
>> {
>> @@ -422,18 +429,30 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *it
>> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>> cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> tdp_iter_refresh_walk(iter);
>> - return false;
>> - } else {
>> return true;
>> - }
>> + } else
>> + return false;
>
> Kernel style is to have curly braces on all branches if any branch has 'em. Or,
> omit the else since the taken branch always returns. I think I prefer the latter?
>
>> }
>>
>> -static void tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
>> +/*
>> + * Yield if the MMU lock is contended or this thread needs to return control
>> + * to the scheduler.
>> + *
>> + * If this function yields, it will also reset the tdp_iter's walk over the
>> + * paging structure and the calling function should allow the iterator to
>> + * continue its traversal from the paging structure root.
>> + *
>> + * Return true if this function yielded and the iterator's traversal was reset.
>> + * Return false if a yield was not needed.
>> + */
>> +static bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
>> {
>> if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
>> cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> tdp_iter_refresh_walk(iter);
>> - }
>> + return true;
>> + } else
>> + return false;
>
> Same here.
>
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -470,7 +489,8 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>> tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
>>
>> if (can_yield)
>> - flush_needed = tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
>> + flush_needed = !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm,
>> + &iter);
>
> As with the existing code, I'd let this poke out. Alternatively, this could be
> written as:
>
> flush_needed = !can_yield ||
> !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
>
>> else
>> flush_needed = true;
>> }
>> @@ -1072,7 +1092,7 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>
>> tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
>>
>> - spte_set = tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
>> + spte_set = !tdp_mmu_iter_flush_cond_resched(kvm, &iter);
>> }
>>
>> if (spte_set)
>> --
>> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
>>
>
Tweaked and queued, thanks.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 18:10 [PATCH 00/24] Allow parallel page faults with TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/24] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for rwlocks Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/24] sched: Add needbreak " Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/24] sched: Add cond_resched_rwlock Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/24] kvm: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 18:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 20:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Fix yielding in TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-22 1:06 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Skip no-op changes in TDP MMU functions Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-25 23:51 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add comment on __tdp_mmu_set_spte Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add lockdep when setting a TDP MMU SPTE Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 19:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Don't redundantly clear TDP MMU pt memory Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Factor out handle disconnected pt Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 20:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 11/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Put TDP MMU PT walks in RCU read-critical section Ben Gardon
2021-01-20 22:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 12/24] kvm: x86/kvm: RCU dereference tdp mmu page table links Ben Gardon
2021-01-22 18:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 18:17 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 13/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Only free tdp_mmu pages after a grace period Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 14/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock lock / unlock in a function Ben Gardon
2021-01-13 2:35 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 15/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock cond_resched and needbreak Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 0:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 20:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 17:47 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 17:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 18:11 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 20:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 20:08 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 20:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-27 21:20 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-28 8:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 16/24] kvm: mmu: Wrap mmu_lock assertions Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 17/24] kvm: mmu: Move mmu_lock to struct kvm_arch Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 18/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use an rwlock for the x86 TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 0:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 19/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Protect tdp_mmu_pages with a lock Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-21 21:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:47 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-26 22:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 22:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-27 12:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 13:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 21:07 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 20/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Add atomic option for setting SPTEs Ben Gardon
2021-01-13 0:05 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-26 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 21/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Use atomic ops to set SPTEs in TDP MMU map Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 22/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Flush TLBs after zap in TDP MMU PF handler Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 0:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 23/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Freeze SPTEs in disconnected pages Ben Gardon
2021-01-12 18:10 ` [PATCH 24/24] kvm: x86/mmu: Allow parallel page faults for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-01-21 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 21:57 ` Ben Gardon
2021-01-27 17:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-26 13:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2fd3afe-0345-7275-1bcc-32e7258ccd72@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®