From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932313AbdJ3NLx (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:11:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49690 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932182AbdJ3NLm (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:11:42 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com F2850C1871EE Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=hdegoede@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86 / i915 iosf_mbi / PMIC bus access fixes To: Hans de Goede , Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= , Imre Deak , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" Cc: intel-gfx , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20171019111620.26761-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:11:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171019111620.26761-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas, Ingo, Ping? Can we please get an ack for taking this upstream through the drm subsys tree ? Regards, Hans On 19-10-17 13:16, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is a split-up version of my "drm/i915: Acquire PUNIT->PMIC bus for > intel_uncore_forcewake_reset()" patch, this time with the > arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c split out into a separate patch. > > Since the iosf_mbi changes are fairly isolated, ideally this entire > series would go upstream through the drm tree. X86 maintainers, can > we have an ack for that from one of you please ? > > Regards, > > Hans >