Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

[Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>]

On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
>>> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000			539
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000			545
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010			587
>>> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019			569
>> What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
>> the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
>> ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
>> disappear...
> This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed
> indices are never reclaimed


This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it.

May be I should be more precise in the commit title. Should I leave it 
as it is / remove it?


Thanks, Kathiravan T.

>
> Konrad
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>