From: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@debian.org>,
"Renzo Davoli" <renzo@cs.unibo.it>,
osd@cs.unibo.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2-ptrace_multi
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:44:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a36005b50605192344g1ba5091eq92c43d7cb52eb69d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605192217.30518.ak@suse.de>
On 5/19/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> Alan hacked on this iirc so he might comment.
Al Viro has a similar patch in the FC kernels to govern read access to
/proc/*/maps based on the ptrace permissions. This is probably the
same problem. If you can use ptrace on the target process there is no
security reason why /proc/*/mem access shouldn't be granted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-20 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-18 15:53 ptrace enhancements for VM support (patch proposals follow in sep.msgs) Renzo Davoli
2006-05-18 15:56 ` [PATCH] 1-access_process_vm_user Renzo Davoli
2006-05-18 15:58 ` [PATCH] 2-ptrace_multi Renzo Davoli
2006-05-18 20:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-18 21:13 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-19 2:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-05-19 9:07 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-19 13:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-19 17:45 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-19 19:15 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-19 20:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-19 20:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-20 6:44 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2006-05-20 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-20 18:30 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-20 20:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-05-20 21:39 ` Jeff Dike
2006-05-21 12:38 ` Avi Kivity
2006-05-21 15:28 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-22 13:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-22 15:05 ` Renzo Davoli
2006-05-22 15:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-18 16:07 ` [PATCH] 3-ptrace_vm Renzo Davoli
2006-05-21 8:03 ` ptrace enhancements for VM support (patch proposals follow in sep.msgs) Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a36005b50605192344g1ba5091eq92c43d7cb52eb69d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®