From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750869AbWF3DuA (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:50:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750891AbWF3DuA (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:50:00 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:4546 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869AbWF3Dt7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:49:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hJJ3joOtUWnPKWb3lJ6LjRt+GRn+tNnp/YwekLL7Zj7RW3ezaFKOkAS+/HWGCCfCCx/8g3dS8XFzUPTSWbCdZ2viehdYL3qGL866qN1NFOJnMGGCQyA/2zPer0bOiY/qRdVuqnAKiD0vvKR7kDFfgmknqeK/8rREjXHHpAsCEp8= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:49:57 -0700 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" , "Jason Baron" , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060629073033.GF27526@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <449B42B3.6010908@shaw.ca> <1151071581.3204.14.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151072280.3204.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060627095632.GA22666@elf.ucw.cz> <20060628194913.GA18039@elf.ucw.cz> <20060629073033.GF27526@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > Can you quote part of POSIX where it says that PROT_WRITE must imply > PROT_READ? I never wrote that. What POSIX does specify is that PROT_READ can optionally be implicitly set.