From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992515AbXCBP30 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:29:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992519AbXCBP30 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:29:26 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]:2144 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992515AbXCBP3Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:29:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JX4uWXXWMj9uVRaX0yys2SJqllfUIuNISVMZjY4A/WpcSiN70zJegmQP9xKEl/eU03vd8WFMw63ziVkx/D/NmFqm7yaaxwFUTLJ10HUKn542QuMhYuoI811+4aTrh2gs9R0Ic45YwEd22C5TbLlWksz05ajpYZMkt2AoViGRYQM= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:29:23 -0800 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Dave Kleikamp" Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Badari Pulavarty" , "Amit K. Arora" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, alex@clusterfs.com, suzuki@in.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <1172841831.7992.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070117094658.GA17390@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070225022326.137b4875.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070301183445.GA7911@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <45E7BE4B.5070602@us.ibm.com> <20070301221652.2aa3e973.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1172841831.7992.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/2/07, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > Then there's no need for sys_allocate to return a long. Every syscall must return a long. Otherwise you can have problems on 64-bit archs.