From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760730AbYEXDit (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 23:38:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758914AbYEXDil (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 23:38:41 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:49928 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755722AbYEXDik (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 23:38:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q3KTmrPWGlBI4Zr7uHpzUu5s0wy6ugWAwlItWx2mqfNJ3Scne/UO9gD56qI2huAe3HgB9IM3UK8lTN8369H3t6moc1f1rq60w0deCOH+NFKk2Rfh8eV318xLYzX6oK5g2z8xNm+TvF7m1YWofV59flUf/VeJT7HrC6EDka5mX48= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 20:38:30 -0700 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Daniel Walker" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1211520987.18130.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080523042923.594531457@mvista.com> <20080523042923.916202203@mvista.com> <1211519720.18130.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1211520987.18130.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > I think that ordering is something companies have been wanting for a > long time.. That's your claim. Again, almost nobody outside the realm of embedded fortunately uses priorities. It's a complete waste of time almost all programs, certainly all but one or two on any of my systems. There is already a solution for priority wakeup. Use it and don't punish everybody else for your needs.