From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEE51ABEB5; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 23:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722642853; cv=none; b=XwxEIWWPqX4ihJxbEbRo0z045w6he0pyhzfHECcxhvxVtfiuKZx24pDbPdY1DUy6GFdsPCLiVjCDdThxJ9g9P0KkHKN/JUqdqIMcqwcCHal170mtAwYi3q4otwF136k5hqaNNbUxonu7wGBZ1UV13yMTKIe9CerKGgydId01us4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722642853; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rZWiK/1Iv5H1CIZJmuDlsAC2QQMACq9GkygNZXvWqao=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=Hfd/lknI+modIiDsSVCDafqcDp1pXSoEn1QcjcskWXK0Cnqk+K2aH+tl0cIgVasVL/uLVoj6eJY2jPnLtbxo1gTNy+T+ZAoBL/jKthR+eePhBs0UDTiQ95CfPxkket9vPmoUHY246IX7HXoC2VbvbEMTZCEPZVW09v+x8dRuObQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Rv/qJOuX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Rv/qJOuX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 257CFC32782; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 23:54:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722642853; bh=rZWiK/1Iv5H1CIZJmuDlsAC2QQMACq9GkygNZXvWqao=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=Rv/qJOuXnUmTm3eWwR0mynFUfyKHUZXHklIB5sIbTpbhPx85sDI2RZ0S45FMHcCv2 SFoHo245sL8r+yleuZ+FP/+Ia1mJQgMs7niUVrbBU+vR0gIDF3Vt/Gj0Ou+r5ESn9p hsnxDJEekaT0rey6uR0I2S23JdiAs7cbh4hSq3fHlLRclxAzH/PzLOcLlqSUfZU9fe pZgEm0dpxU6R8O3cfsnQI6n/0utv0xtyYPj4a6T4MH8Ffpo2cORe7AWiERkJtWkcTc KNQkcpWmGDOLsWWAj03kkWd4Z7RL9MBbVQtOcmCCSZcM0z9OZ6IjbrmLXBzLQI/i0V 10brQgMOqnl+g== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240731191312.1710417-4-robh@kernel.org> References: <20240731191312.1710417-4-robh@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use of_property_present() From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Walleij , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring (Arm) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 16:54:11 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Rob Herring (Arm) (2024-07-31 12:12:42) > Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than > of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove > callers of of_find_property() and similar functions. > of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers > which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) > --- Applied to clk-next