From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
To: Shreenidhi Shedi <yesshedi@gmail.com>,
amakhalov@vmware.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, pv-drivers@vmware.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/vmware: use unsigned integer for shifting
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a38ef828-dbfa-59c0-475d-e16c44267e6b@csail.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520140954.597725-1-sshedi@vmware.com>
On 5/20/22 7:09 AM, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
> From: Shreenidhi Shedi <yesshedi@gmail.com>
>
> From: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi@vmware.com>
>
> Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is implementation-defined
> behaviour. Using unsigned is better option for this.
>
> Fixes: 4cca6ea04d31 ("x86/apic: Allow x2apic without IR on VMware platform")
>
> Signed-off-by: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi@vmware.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> index c04b933f48d3..cd809c5b17f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> #include <linux/static_call.h>
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> @@ -476,8 +477,8 @@ static bool __init vmware_legacy_x2apic_available(void)
> {
> uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> VMWARE_CMD(GETVCPU_INFO, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> - return (eax & (1 << VMWARE_CMD_VCPU_RESERVED)) == 0 &&
> - (eax & (1 << VMWARE_CMD_LEGACY_X2APIC)) != 0;
> + return !(eax & BIT(VMWARE_CMD_VCPU_RESERVED)) &&
> + (eax & BIT(VMWARE_CMD_LEGACY_X2APIC))
This patch has clearly not been tested, and not even compiled! (It is
missing a semicolon at the end of the return statement).
Please take your time to revise and test your patch based on the
review feedback; there is no hurry! :)
(Also, while at it, the double From: at the beginning of the patch
needs to be fixed too).
Regards,
Srivatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 14:09 Shreenidhi Shedi
2022-05-20 15:41 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2022-05-20 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a38ef828-dbfa-59c0-475d-e16c44267e6b@csail.mit.edu \
--to=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=amakhalov@vmware.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=sshedi@vmware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yesshedi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome