Re: [PATCH V4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimise non-coherent unmap

[Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>]

On 8/12/2024 9:53 AM, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 8/6/2024 4:21 PM, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>> The current __arm_lpae_unmap() function calls dma_sync() on individual
>> PTEs after clearing them. Overall unmap performance can be improved by
>> around 25% for large buffer sizes by combining the syncs for adjacent
>> leaf entries.
>> Optimize the unmap time by clearing all the leaf entries and issuing a
>> single dma_sync() for them.
>> Below is detailed analysis of average unmap latency(in us) with and
>> without this optimization obtained by running dma_map_benchmark for
>> different buffer sizes.
>>
>>               UnMap Latency(us)
>> Size  Without         With            % gain with
>>       optimiztion     optimization    optimization
>>
>> 4KB   3               3               0
>> 8KB   4               3.8             5
>> 16KB  6.1             5.4             11.48
>> 32KB  10.2            8.5             16.67
>> 64KB  18.5            14.9            19.46
>> 128KB 35              27.5            21.43
>> 256KB 67.5            52.2            22.67
>> 512KB 127.9           97.2            24.00
>> 1MB   248.6           187.4           24.62
>> 2MB   65.5            65.5            0
>> 4MB   119.2           119             0.17
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Updated the commit message to be imperative.
>> - Fixed ptep at incorrect index getting cleared for non-leaf entries.
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - Used loop-local variables and removed redundant function variables.
>> - Added check for zero-sized dma_sync in __arm_lpae_clear_pte().
>> - Merged both patches into this single patch by adding check for a
>>    NULL gather in __arm_lpae_unmap() itself.
>>
>> Changes in V4:
>> - Updated the subject in commit message to correctly reflect the changes
>>    made in this patch.
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c 
>> b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>> index f5d9fd1f45bf..6fecf3d9fe67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>> @@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte 
>> *ptep, int num_entries,
>>                                  sizeof(*ptep) * num_entries, 
>> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>>   }
>>
>> -static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct 
>> io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
>> +static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct 
>> io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, int num_entries)
>>   {
>> +     for (int i = 0; i < num_entries; i++)
>> +             ptep[i] = 0;
>>
>> -     *ptep = 0;
>> -
>> -     if (!cfg->coherent_walk)
>> -             __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, 1, cfg);
>> +     if (!cfg->coherent_walk && num_entries)
>> +             __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, num_entries, cfg);
>>   }
>>
>>   static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
>> @@ -654,26 +654,29 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct 
>> arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
>>               max_entries = ARM_LPAE_PTES_PER_TABLE(data) - 
>> unmap_idx_start;
>>               num_entries = min_t(int, pgcount, max_entries);
>>
>> -             while (i < num_entries) {
>> -                     pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
>> +             /* Find and handle non-leaf entries */
>> +             for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>> +                     pte = READ_ONCE(ptep[i]);
>>                       if (WARN_ON(!pte))
>>                               break;
>>
>> -                     __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg);
>> -
>>                       if (!iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) {
>> +                             __arm_lpae_clear_pte(&ptep[i], 
>> &iop->cfg, 1);
>> +
>>                               /* Also flush any partial walks */
>>                               io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i 
>> * size, size,
>> ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data));
>>                               __arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, 
>> iopte_deref(pte, data));
>> -                     } else if (!iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather)) {
>> -                             io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, 
>> iova + i * size, size);
>>                       }
>> -
>> -                     ptep++;
>> -                     i++;
>>               }
>>
>> +             /* Clear the remaining entries */
>> +             __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, i);
>> +
>> +             if (gather && !iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather))
>> +                     for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)
>> +                             io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, 
>> iova + j * size, size);
>> +
>>               return i * size;
>>       } else if (iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) {
>>               /*
>
> Hi all,
>
> Can you please review this patch and provide feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish Mhetre
>
>

Hi Will, Joerg,

The patch is reviewed by Robin. If there are no more comments,
can you please see if you can merge it?

Thanks and Regards,
Ashish Mhetre