Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: 8250_of: manage bus clock in suspend/resume

[Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>]

On 4/11/25 2:30 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:44:18AM -0500, Alex Elder kirjoitti:
>> Save the bus clock pointer in the of_serial_info structure, and use
>> that to disable the bus clock on suspend and re-enable it on resume.
> 
> ...
> 
>>   	if (!port->uartclk) {
>> -		struct clk *bus_clk;
>> -
>> -		bus_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "bus");
>> -		if (IS_ERR(bus_clk)) {
>> -			ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bus_clk), "failed to get bus clock\n");
>> +		info->bus_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "bus");
>> +		if (IS_ERR(info->bus_clk)) {
>> +			ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(info->bus_clk),
>> +					    "failed to get bus clock\n");
>>   			goto err_pmruntime;
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		/* If the bus clock is required, core clock must be named */
>> -		info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, bus_clk ? "core" : NULL);
>> +		info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, info->bus_clk ? "core" : NULL);
>>   		if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) {
>>   			ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(info->clk), "failed to get clock\n");
> 
> While the first patch against this file looks okay now, this one inherits the
> same problem (seems like not enought thinking about the code representation).
> 
> Instead of rewritting half of the lines you just introduced (which is also a
> bad practice), add a one-liner that assigns a field to the local variable.

So you want me to re-spin this again so that I use the local variable?

I understand what you're saying based on ease of review, but this
is a simple patch and the change is very understandable, and the
code is no more or less clear when using the local variable.

					-Alex


> 
>>   			goto err_pmruntime;
> 
>