Re: [PATCH net] net: selinux: fix memory leak in selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create()

[maowenan <maowenan@huawei.com>]

On 2019/3/8 4:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:44 PM Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> If netlbl_sock_setattr() is failed, it directly returns rc and forgets
>> to free secattr.
>>
>> BUG: memory leak
>> unreferenced object 0xffff8883c3ea4200 (size 2664):
>>   comm "syz-executor.2", pid 8813, jiffies 4297264419 (age 156.090s)
>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>     7f 00 00 01 7f 00 00 01 eb 7f ed 71 4e 24 00 00  ...........qN$..
>>     02 00 07 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ...@............
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<000000004c0228da>] sk_alloc+0x3d/0xc00 net/core/sock.c:1523
>>     [<00000000535a3da2>] inet_create+0x339/0xe10 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:321
>>     [<000000009aec3cfe>] __sock_create+0x3fa/0x790 net/socket.c:1275
>>     [<000000004274b384>] sock_create net/socket.c:1315 [inline]
>>     [<000000004274b384>] __sys_socket+0xe7/0x1d0 net/socket.c:1345
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1354 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1352 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __x64_sys_socket+0x74/0xb0 net/socket.c:1352
>>     [<000000004ae3186e>] do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
>>     [<00000000bc0d2230>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>     [<00000000f737e62f>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>>
>> BUG: memory leak
>> unreferenced object 0xffff8883de23d570 (size 32):
>>   comm "syz-executor.2", pid 8813, jiffies 4297264419 (age 156.090s)
>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>     02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 60 a9 40 ce 83 88 ff ff  ........`.@.....
>>     01 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<0000000035ba8b75>] security_sk_alloc+0x5e/0xb0 security/security.c:1473
>>     [<00000000302cc426>] sk_prot_alloc+0x8e/0x290 net/core/sock.c:1472
>>     [<000000004c0228da>] sk_alloc+0x3d/0xc00 net/core/sock.c:1523
>>     [<00000000535a3da2>] inet_create+0x339/0xe10 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:321
>>     [<000000009aec3cfe>] __sock_create+0x3fa/0x790 net/socket.c:1275
>>     [<000000004274b384>] sock_create net/socket.c:1315 [inline]
>>     [<000000004274b384>] __sys_socket+0xe7/0x1d0 net/socket.c:1345
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1354 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1352 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __x64_sys_socket+0x74/0xb0 net/socket.c:1352
>>     [<000000004ae3186e>] do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
>>     [<00000000bc0d2230>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>     [<00000000f737e62f>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>>
>> BUG: memory leak
>> unreferenced object 0xffff8883ce40a960 (size 64):
>>   comm "syz-executor.2", pid 8813, jiffies 4297264420 (age 156.089s)
>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<0000000029add401>] selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create+0x68/0x130 security/selinux/netlabel.c:416
>>     [<000000005368a19c>] selinux_socket_post_create+0x31a/0x7f0 security/selinux/hooks.c:4597
>>     [<00000000bd4730e2>] security_socket_post_create+0x70/0xc0 security/security.c:1385
>>     [<00000000671052a4>] __sock_create+0x5a6/0x790 net/socket.c:1291
>>     [<000000004274b384>] sock_create net/socket.c:1315 [inline]
>>     [<000000004274b384>] __sys_socket+0xe7/0x1d0 net/socket.c:1345
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1354 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1352 [inline]
>>     [<00000000b3fdc826>] __x64_sys_socket+0x74/0xb0 net/socket.c:1352
>>     [<000000004ae3186e>] do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
>>     [<00000000bc0d2230>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>     [<00000000f737e62f>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>>
>> Fixes: 389fb800ac8b("netlabel: Label incoming TCP connections correctly in SELinux")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  security/selinux/netlabel.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/netlabel.c b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
>> index 186e727b737b..f3da05338580 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
>> +++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
>> @@ -426,6 +426,9 @@ int selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create(struct sock *sk, u16 family)
>>                 rc = 0;
>>                 break;
>>         }
>> +       if (rc != 0) {
>> +               netlbl_secattr_free(secattr);
>> +       }
> 
> This is likely going to cause a problem as the
> sock->sk_security->nlbl_secattr still has a reference to the secattr
> pointer you are releasing here.  Assuming things are working correctly
> elsewhere, I believe freeing secattr here will result in a double free
> when the network stacks cleans up after the failed socket creation
> (via the sock_release() call in the error handling code).
Do you mean here?
	err = security_socket_post_create(sock, family, type, protocol, kern);
	if (err)
		goto out_sock_release;
        ...

	out_sock_release:
		sock_release(sock);
		return err;
yes, the call trace may like below:
	sock_release->__sock_release->inet_release->tcp_close->sock_put->sk_free->__sk_free->sk_destruct->
	__sk_destruct->sk_prot_free->security_sk_free->selinux_sk_free_security->selinux_netlbl_sk_security_free->
	netlbl_secattr_free

so, it is no need to free in selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create().
Please correct me if this is incorrect.

> 
> It looks like you may have found this via a test tool (syzbot?), do
> you have a reproducer you can share?
> 
The issue has been found by syzkaller, but unfortunately it is no reproducer, it is
only some backtrace.