From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755238AbYISTz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:55:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753931AbYISTzV (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:55:21 -0400 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:37865 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753590AbYISTzU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:55:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=gvLOjhJWk+mZ+TEZXODzkgjAPwEdywLBJZmkm1tWC977LBTdYZ3Ne5TnUnU6cpMNBG YvtYj+MXMCZz+D9luzq3fyY1lE8GwwAsgY/UOLJJAcAxjqlTsiGdiNBbUj20J5nE8nzp 4Uso3nSyTgZzuxluTJYPKqZPay6x/5g+elK0w= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:55:18 -0700 From: "VDR User" To: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Multiproto API/Driver Update In-Reply-To: <200809191258.35827.julian@jusst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <466109.26020.qm@web46101.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <48CDF7A1.2020905@jusst.de> <37219a840809150842l3a6260j4b57f14026e5c40a@mail.gmail.com> <200809191258.35827.julian@jusst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Julian, thanks for taking the time to dig into the history deeper! As I've stated before, there is much more to the story (both in terms of technical and personal) and it's obvious that certain people are trying to shape the users perception (even if it means misleading them) in order to gain their support. Dirty tactics in my opinion but I guess when you want to win that bad, you will do whatever it takes @ any cost. Best regards. (I apologize if this was posted twice to the ml.)