From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S933130AbdBVSNK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:13:10 -0500
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:46254 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932610AbdBVSND (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:13:03 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,195,1484035200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="936930135"
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] x86: Provide general kernel support for
 memory encryption
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
References: <20170216154158.19244.66630.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net>
 <20170216154332.19244.55451.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Message-ID: <a3f56612-396e-b230-d909-93a7128ea2fc@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:13:00 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170216154332.19244.55451.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02/16/2017 07:43 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>  static inline unsigned long pte_pfn(pte_t pte)
>  {
> -	return (pte_val(pte) & PTE_PFN_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	return (pte_val(pte) & ~sme_me_mask & PTE_PFN_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_val(pmd) & pmd_pfn_mask(pmd)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	return (pmd_val(pmd) & ~sme_me_mask & pmd_pfn_mask(pmd)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  }

Could you talk a bit about why you chose to do the "~sme_me_mask" bit in
here instead of making it a part of PTE_PFN_MASK / pmd_pfn_mask(pmd)?

It might not matter, but I'd be worried that this ends up breaking
direct users of PTE_PFN_MASK / pmd_pfn_mask(pmd) since they now no
longer mask the PFN out of a PTE.