From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760009AbXGLIZ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:25:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752096AbXGLIZQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:25:16 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:48519 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbXGLIZO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:25:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RPs0oWHo1YolWgIZvkJZtN2qMo0J5P83w3KIIHAN5jkBXMTXAB+pWPo4cG+zSYYEUfxFM0gyuCjflbdf/mz9uO7VGqZ7QAMQelZkSEN0cHqLtAJHApQFTSS2M3HFUmn1QrrdiZ9Mn4ypWzU2MyfJrVolFfL3SAsDxxXIl5LN1Bs= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:25:13 -0700 From: "Miles Lane" To: "Tejun Heo" Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 -- BUG - EIP: [] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x1c2/0x226 SS:ESP 0068:c5ff9db8 Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <46959A2C.7090908@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <468F36F5.4010803@gmail.com> <469038EF.7040709@gmail.com> <469484E1.6040000@gmail.com> <4694A769.7040502@gmail.com> <46959A2C.7090908@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun, I tried 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 + your latest patch, and it failed to boot. Unfortunately, the machine limped along and am unable to capture the initial BUG or OOPS. I'll try to get a serial connection set up for debugging tomorrow, but I am very busy with other stuff. It would be great if you could test your own build with the .config file I initially sent to you for the original BUG: issue. If you would like me to resend the .config, just let me know. Miles On 7/11/07, Tejun Heo wrote: > Miles Lane wrote: > > Does this patch replace or add to the last patch you sent me? > > I'll try applying them with --dry-run and assume that if #1 + #2 > > doesn't apply cleanly, then you only want me to test with this > > latest patch. > > This replaces the old one. Just revert the old one and apply this one. > > > I'll be able to test this later this evening. I've had house guests and > > so haven't been available the last few days. > > Yeap, I'll wait for the result. Thanks a lot. > > -- > tejun >