From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC0130594E; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 06:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774680242; cv=none; b=nNHHlvZpxVl2Steh6S/NDTmyKURa8NGVWkGvpWqeyhUCsMjopQtwJDtA9cAzozFFQSMTtwrNmY4wgzF0B0UzQ9lwBW2hLVd+57Bwtko6AdlsMQxgPLH3FewamL7n5kl687ac/tq0yyc72jvwRjeYtXn1ZnGjiAsAidZUNLVACF8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774680242; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OCQ7xdDKzEC0lFAjkEryn6WP9INTgzW/siQ1oZjwxoA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=O5EVof+Dyb2KPTAYba8lnWbmXemaanB373h8Bi/KFrceK82G36RA7mBRQgeAqcw2Rqlr1mpqb/YQWAhp9uxAu+/RjmEHgrfvvER7rCLoVyfvBmfHd9NqC/sTtkK6semIkJd4b96SL4m5jM6b7KjXeAdCe/2vKxpyQGpEOHv9Q5c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=ezHRUiTx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="ezHRUiTx" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 964F41125E5; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 07:43:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1774680238; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=K8IExplj4jNkiy6koIYs6HsbetYK5EUUl0gJcPtFT+I=; b=ezHRUiTxuJwQt9p9FGgw0+VcCYPZNLrdcS82esBojW4G5HRjxLzZt9XDmrG5yGqhjfEOWz DZMKBGBet8COkiky3tcehlbt9Fjka6XrG6pushgkBdPmTG+iAe63057Au7Z2hCBxfdfINg DXGv4+YiV8vyVN/UCd6ZIK9BvP/YnlywaO10Eh4tdJhN9A6MjmtGo7Cf1sa5q7cs8qgs5D j+2DNbD2M+suMlEPacgpl3wc+K9FRAEMSElBKXF3ukePZkl77yDhSuoJ9Yoa46+0FRRZg6 UxYT3L5FZY/fpPIOhnYscWsqUzH425pkUQ+P+v5yvznC7gd/qEE2eIHUabeRUw== Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:17:31 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/9] dt-bindings: display: fsl,ldb: Add i.MX94 LDB To: Liu Ying , Marco Felsch Cc: Laurentiu Palcu , imx@lists.linux.dev, Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Marek Vasut , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Frank Li , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260304-dcif-upstreaming-v8-0-bec5c047edd4@oss.nxp.com> <20260304-dcif-upstreaming-v8-1-bec5c047edd4@oss.nxp.com> <40b3d1c8-0cf2-470d-8223-751240061735@nabladev.com> <4e75f1d3-29ff-46a2-adb5-78a08f781834@nabladev.com> <2fe36f04-97d3-4e99-97e9-7a3ac53cffdb@nxp.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <2fe36f04-97d3-4e99-97e9-7a3ac53cffdb@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 3/23/26 8:22 AM, Liu Ying wrote: Hello Liu, > ... i.MX8MP LVDS bridge node is fine with the reg property, but the property > is not allowed for i.MX93 LVDS bridge node according to commit[1] while > commit[2] requires the property for all LVDS bridge nodes. See the contradict > here? > > [1] 3feaa4342637 dt-bindings: soc: imx93-media-blk-ctrl: Add PDFC subnode to schema and example > [2] 8aa2f0ac08d3 dt-bindings: display: bridge: ldb: Add check for reg and reg-names > > To avoid the contradict, how about requiring the reg property only for i.MX6SX > and i.MX8MP LVDS bridge nodes and making it kind of optional for i.MX93 and > i.MX94 LVDS bridge nodes? I would be fine with that, thanks !