mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>, <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tony@atomide.com>,
	<dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Complete the cookie first on transfer completion
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:00:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4b6fc99-13a9-b78f-b395-8b3e5eb30642@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721094704.GL5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 07/21/16 12:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:33:12PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 07/20/16 09:26, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>>> Speaking of which, from a purely design point of view, as long as you think
>>> beforehand what is your sequence, ie. what is the sequence of your link
>>> chaining, completion handling, etc ..., both marking before or after next tx
>>> start should be fine IMHO.
>>
>> Yes, it might be a bit better from performance point of view if we first start
>> the pending descriptor (if there is one) then do the vchan_cookie_complete().
>> On the other hand if we care more about latency and accuracy we should
>> complete the transfer first then look for pending descriptors. But since
>> virt_dma is using a tasklet for the real completion, the latency is always
>> going to be when the tasklet is given the chance to execute.
> 
> I think this shows a slight misunderstanding of the DMA engine API.  The
> DMA completion is defined by the API to always happen in tasklet context,
> which is why the virt-dma stuff does it that way - and all other DMA
> engine drivers.  It's one of the fundamentals of the API.
> 
> As it happens in tasklet context, tasklets can be scheduled to run with
> variable latency, so any use of the DMA engine API which has a predictable
> latency around the completion handling is going to be unreliable.
> 
> Remember also that with circular buffers, there's no guarantee of getting
> period-based completion callbacks - several periods can complete and you
> are only guaranteed to get one completion callback.
> 
> So, the idea that completion callbacks can have anything to do with low
> latency or accuracy is totally incorrect.

Thanks for refreshing my memory, you are absolutely right.

-- 
Péter

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-14 12:42 [PATCH 0/7] dmaengine:omap-dma: Linked List transfer for slave_sg Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Simplify omap_dma_start_sg parameter list Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Complete the cookie first on transfer completion Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:34   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-19 12:35     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-19 16:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-19 19:23         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-24  7:39         ` Vinod Koul
2016-07-20  6:26       ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-07-21  9:33         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-21  9:35           ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-21  9:47           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-22 11:00             ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Simplify omap_dma_callback Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Dynamically allocate memory for lch_map Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Add more debug information when freeing channel Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Use pointer to omap_sg in slave_sg setup's loop Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Support for LinkedList transfer of slave_sg Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 11:12     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/7] dmaengine:omap-dma: Linked List transfer for slave_sg Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 12:07   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 12:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 12:30       ` Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4b6fc99-13a9-b78f-b395-8b3e5eb30642@ti.com \
    --to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®