From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: "bert hubert" <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, ming@acis.ufl.edu,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm-cache: block level disk cache target for device mapper
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:55:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0611271155q55adf6fftd489de84d6ae7e88@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061127184748.GA11219@outpost.ds9a.nl>
On 11/27/06, bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:26:34PM +0000, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > This is the first cut of a device-mapper target which provides a write-back
> > or write-through block cache. It is intended to be used in conjunction with
> > remote block devices such as iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet, particularly in
> > cluster situations.
>
> How does this work in practice? In other words, what is a typical actual
> configuration?
>
> There is a remote block device, and a local one, and these are kept into
> sync in some way?
>
That's the basic idea. In our testbed, we had a single iSCSI server
exporting block devices to several clients -- each maintaining their
own local disk cache of the server exported block devices. You can
configured either write-through or write-back policies -- write-back
has better performance, but somewhat obvious consistency issues in
failure cases.
The original intent was to combine this with the dm-cow target (which
I posted a few hours before the dm-cache patch) to provide a scalable
cluster deployment system based on back-end iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet
storage.
-eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-27 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-27 18:26 Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-11-27 18:47 ` bert hubert
2006-11-27 19:55 ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2006-12-02 1:21 ` [dm-devel] " Ming Zhang
2006-12-02 18:28 ` Ming Zhao
2006-12-02 18:35 ` Ming Zhang
2006-11-30 11:32 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Wilke
2006-11-30 16:24 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-11-30 20:07 ` Jens Wilke
2006-12-01 7:16 ` Ming Zhao
2006-12-01 10:30 ` Jens Wilke
2006-11-30 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-11 18:54 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4e6962a0611271155q55adf6fftd489de84d6ae7e88@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming@acis.ufl.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome