mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@gmail.com>
To: "bert hubert" <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, ming@acis.ufl.edu,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] dm-cache: block level disk cache target for device mapper
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:55:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0611271155q55adf6fftd489de84d6ae7e88@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061127184748.GA11219@outpost.ds9a.nl>

On 11/27/06, bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 06:26:34PM +0000, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > This is the first cut of a device-mapper target which provides a write-back
> > or write-through block cache.  It is intended to be used in conjunction with
> > remote block devices such as iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet, particularly in
> > cluster situations.
>
> How does this work in practice? In other words, what is a typical actual
> configuration?
>
> There is a remote block device, and a local one, and these are kept into
> sync in some way?
>

That's the basic idea.  In our testbed, we had a single iSCSI server
exporting block devices to several clients -- each maintaining their
own local disk cache of the server exported block devices.  You can
configured either write-through or write-back policies -- write-back
has better performance, but somewhat obvious consistency issues in
failure cases.

The original intent was to combine this with the dm-cow target (which
I posted a few hours before the dm-cache patch) to provide a scalable
cluster deployment system based on back-end iSCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet
storage.

          -eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-27 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-27 18:26 Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-11-27 18:47 ` bert hubert
2006-11-27 19:55   ` Eric Van Hensbergen [this message]
2006-12-02  1:21     ` [dm-devel] " Ming Zhang
2006-12-02 18:28       ` Ming Zhao
2006-12-02 18:35         ` Ming Zhang
2006-11-30 11:32 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Wilke
2006-11-30 16:24   ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-11-30 20:07     ` Jens Wilke
2006-12-01  7:16       ` Ming Zhao
2006-12-01 10:30         ` Jens Wilke
2006-11-30 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-11 18:54 ` Eric Van Hensbergen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4e6962a0611271155q55adf6fftd489de84d6ae7e88@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming@acis.ufl.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome